Skip to content
Close Menu
ConvictionConviction
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

When intolerable workplace conditions force an employee to resign

June 19, 2026

Employers who fail to pay pension contributions can be forced to pay from their own pockets

June 19, 2026

Everyone wanted this Bentley, but only one owner had the right to sell it

June 19, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trending
  • When intolerable workplace conditions force an employee to resign
  • Employers who fail to pay pension contributions can be forced to pay from their own pockets
  • Everyone wanted this Bentley, but only one owner had the right to sell it
  • Excluded Xihahele households awarded R21.4 million in land restitution settlement
  • South Africa’s migration tensions reveal deeper economic and governance failures
  • Huawei Care misled consumers by promising theft cover but excluding thefts that did not involve force
  • Home Affairs says there is no deadline for foreign nationals to leave South Africa
  • New acting judges’ rules introduce a 12-year legal experience requirement from 1 July 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
ConvictionConviction
Sonneblom
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch
ConvictionConviction
Home » Hospital’s medical negligence during childbirth caused baby’s brain injury and cerebral palsy
Civil Law

Hospital’s medical negligence during childbirth caused baby’s brain injury and cerebral palsy

The Supreme Court of Appeal confirmed that Itokolle Clinix Private Hospital’s negligent maternity care led to a baby’s brain injury, dismissing the hospital’s appeal and reinforcing accountability in childbirth.
Kennedy MudzuliBy Kennedy MudzuliOctober 17, 2025Updated:October 17, 2025No Comments
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
Itokolle Clinix Hospital, found liable by the Supreme Court of Appeal for medical negligence during childbirth after its appeal was dismissed.
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

 

• Court finds hospital liable for medical negligence during childbirth.  
• Experts confirm prolonged oxygen deprivation caused the baby’s brain injury.  
• Appeal dismissed with costs after the hospital rejected a fair settlement offer.

The Supreme Court of Appeal ruled that Itokolle Clinix Private Hospital was negligent during childbirth, causing a baby to suffer a severe brain injury and lifelong cerebral palsy.

The court found that nurses failed to monitor the mother’s contractions and the baby’s heartbeat, allowing oxygen deprivation to go undetected until it caused lasting harm.

The mother, known as MNT, gave birth at the Mahikeng-based hospital in January 2007 under the care of obstetrician Dr Kofi Ofori Amanfo. Her daughter, referred to as D, was delivered after a difficult labour but was not breathing and had no heartbeat at birth. Though resuscitated after 20 minutes, the baby suffered permanent brain damage that left her quadriplegic.

Expert evidence exposes critical failures

Medical experts testified that the baby’s brain injury was caused by long periods of oxygen deprivation that hospital staff failed to notice. Professor Johan Smith, a neonatologist, described the failure as catastrophic. “The administration of syntocinon at 20:45 was the last straw that broke the camel’s back,” he said, referring to a labour-inducing drug given without proper supervision.

Professor Coetzee, an obstetrician, supported this view, saying the baby’s oxygen reserves were “consistently depleted” while staff failed to take action. Their testimony showed that proper monitoring could have completely prevented the injury.

Accountability and vicarious liability confirmed

Judge P Coppin, writing for a unanimous bench, held that hospital staff were negligent and their conduct fell far below professional standards. “The hospital’s midwives were causally negligent in handling the respondent’s labour, and their negligence caused the harm suffered by D,” the court stated.

The court reaffirmed the principle of vicarious liability, making the hospital legally responsible for its employees’ actions. The judgment stressed that hospitals must provide attentive maternity care and that lapses in monitoring can lead to devastating, lifelong consequences.

Hospital’s appeal dismissed and costs awarded

The hospital’s appeal was dismissed with costs after the court found it had unreasonably rejected a settlement offer before trial. The mother had proposed to settle if the hospital accepted 85% liability, but it countered with only 50%.

“The hospital’s conduct in these circumstances was shown not to have been reasonable,” the court noted. It ordered the hospital to pay all legal costs, including attorney fees, citing the unnecessary delay in litigation.

The court stated that “had the midwives properly monitored the fetus, the brain injury could probably have been avoided”.

Conviction.co.za

Get your news on the go. Click here to follow the Conviction WhatsApp channel.

 

 

cerebral palsy Healthcare Accountability medical negligence during childbirth patient rights Supreme Court of Appeal
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Kennedy Mudzuli

Multiple award-winner with passion for news and training young journalists. Founder and editor of Conviction.co.za

Related Posts

Everyone wanted this Bentley, but only one owner had the right to sell it

June 19, 2026

Child in R31 million medical negligence claim awarded R2.8 million for urgent care

June 17, 2026

Municipality liable for shutting down businesses in R18.6 million damages claim

June 12, 2026
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Prove your humanity: 6   +   8   =  

Subscribe to our newsletter:
Top Posts

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024

Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

November 27, 2024

Irregular levy increases, mismanagement, and legal threats in a sectional title scheme

June 2, 2025
Don't Miss
Employment and Labour Law Series
6 Mins Read

When intolerable workplace conditions force an employee to resign

By Ann-Suhet MarxJune 19, 20266 Mins Read

Recent Labour Court and CCMA decisions show how ignored grievances, workplace bullying, retaliation and unreasonable changes to working conditions can amount to constructive dismissal.

Employers who fail to pay pension contributions can be forced to pay from their own pockets

June 19, 2026

Everyone wanted this Bentley, but only one owner had the right to sell it

June 19, 2026

Excluded Xihahele households awarded R21.4 million in land restitution settlement

June 19, 2026
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • WhatsApp
Demo
About Us
About Us

Helping South Africans to navigate the legal landscape; providing accessible legal information; and giving a voice to those seeking justice.

Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube WhatsApp Twitch RSS
Latest posts

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024

Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

November 27, 2024
OUR PICKS

Standard Bank should have investigated mental health concerns before dismissal, CCMA finds

June 10, 2026

Foreign nationals leave SA amid growing tension ahead of planned 30 June deadline

June 17, 2026

Attorney who blames secretary is like surgeon blaming nurse, judge says

June 18, 2026
© 2026 Conviction.
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Powered by
►
Necessary cookies enable essential site features like secure log-ins and consent preference adjustments. They do not store personal data.
None
►
Functional cookies support features like content sharing on social media, collecting feedback, and enabling third-party tools.
None
►
Analytical cookies track visitor interactions, providing insights on metrics like visitor count, bounce rate, and traffic sources.
None
►
Advertisement cookies deliver personalized ads based on your previous visits and analyze the effectiveness of ad campaigns.
None
►
Unclassified cookies are cookies that we are in the process of classifying, together with the providers of individual cookies.
None
Powered by