Skip to content
Close Menu
ConvictionConviction
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

A message to the hippos: Informal economy is not Africa’s development strategy

September 21, 2026

Operation Shanela R44 000 theft case puts police integrity on the line

September 21, 2026

Regulator exposes Big 5 Finance for reckless lending and unlawful loan charges

September 21, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trending
  • A message to the hippos: Informal economy is not Africa’s development strategy
  • Operation Shanela R44 000 theft case puts police integrity on the line
  • Regulator exposes Big 5 Finance for reckless lending and unlawful loan charges
  • Murder-for-payout schemes shake South Africa’s insurance sector amid rising fraud
  • Kempton Park murder investigation is being driven by evidence, not public pressure
  • Xenophobic landlord who unleashed gang rape on Zimbabwean tenant loses conviction appeal
  • V&A Waterfront judgment shows honesty is the first qualification any employee brings to work
  • Fort Hare to honour retired Justice Mbuyiseli Madlanga with honorary Doctor of Laws
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
ConvictionConviction
Sonneblom
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch
ConvictionConviction
Home » Hospital’s medical negligence during childbirth caused baby’s brain injury and cerebral palsy
Civil Law

Hospital’s medical negligence during childbirth caused baby’s brain injury and cerebral palsy

The Supreme Court of Appeal confirmed that Itokolle Clinix Private Hospital’s negligent maternity care led to a baby’s brain injury, dismissing the hospital’s appeal and reinforcing accountability in childbirth.
Kennedy MudzuliBy Kennedy MudzuliOctober 17, 2025Updated:October 17, 2025No Comments
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
Itokolle Clinix Hospital, found liable by the Supreme Court of Appeal for medical negligence during childbirth after its appeal was dismissed.
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

 

• Court finds hospital liable for medical negligence during childbirth.  
• Experts confirm prolonged oxygen deprivation caused the baby’s brain injury.  
• Appeal dismissed with costs after the hospital rejected a fair settlement offer.

The Supreme Court of Appeal ruled that Itokolle Clinix Private Hospital was negligent during childbirth, causing a baby to suffer a severe brain injury and lifelong cerebral palsy.

The court found that nurses failed to monitor the mother’s contractions and the baby’s heartbeat, allowing oxygen deprivation to go undetected until it caused lasting harm.

The mother, known as MNT, gave birth at the Mahikeng-based hospital in January 2007 under the care of obstetrician Dr Kofi Ofori Amanfo. Her daughter, referred to as D, was delivered after a difficult labour but was not breathing and had no heartbeat at birth. Though resuscitated after 20 minutes, the baby suffered permanent brain damage that left her quadriplegic.

Expert evidence exposes critical failures

Medical experts testified that the baby’s brain injury was caused by long periods of oxygen deprivation that hospital staff failed to notice. Professor Johan Smith, a neonatologist, described the failure as catastrophic. “The administration of syntocinon at 20:45 was the last straw that broke the camel’s back,” he said, referring to a labour-inducing drug given without proper supervision.

Professor Coetzee, an obstetrician, supported this view, saying the baby’s oxygen reserves were “consistently depleted” while staff failed to take action. Their testimony showed that proper monitoring could have completely prevented the injury.

Accountability and vicarious liability confirmed

Judge P Coppin, writing for a unanimous bench, held that hospital staff were negligent and their conduct fell far below professional standards. “The hospital’s midwives were causally negligent in handling the respondent’s labour, and their negligence caused the harm suffered by D,” the court stated.

The court reaffirmed the principle of vicarious liability, making the hospital legally responsible for its employees’ actions. The judgment stressed that hospitals must provide attentive maternity care and that lapses in monitoring can lead to devastating, lifelong consequences.

Hospital’s appeal dismissed and costs awarded

The hospital’s appeal was dismissed with costs after the court found it had unreasonably rejected a settlement offer before trial. The mother had proposed to settle if the hospital accepted 85% liability, but it countered with only 50%.

“The hospital’s conduct in these circumstances was shown not to have been reasonable,” the court noted. It ordered the hospital to pay all legal costs, including attorney fees, citing the unnecessary delay in litigation.

The court stated that “had the midwives properly monitored the fetus, the brain injury could probably have been avoided”.

Conviction.co.za

Get your news on the go. Click here to follow the Conviction WhatsApp channel.

 

 

cerebral palsy Healthcare Accountability medical negligence during childbirth patient rights Supreme Court of Appeal
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Kennedy Mudzuli

Multiple award-winner with passion for news and training young journalists. Founder and editor of Conviction.co.za

Related Posts

Child’s burns expose Eskom’s legal duty to protect communities from dangerous power lines

September 19, 2026

Ex-Emfuleni CFO ordered to pay for calling supply chain manager corrupt on WhatsApp

September 18, 2026

SCA clears SAPS captain as new forensic evidence dismantles murder conviction

September 18, 2026
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Prove your humanity: 10   +   8   =  

Subscribe to our newsletter:
Top Posts

Your driving licence at the gate: What estates can actually legally scan

Sponsor: My Estate LifeSeptember 6, 2026

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024

Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

November 27, 2024
Don't Miss
Opinion
12 Mins Read

A message to the hippos: Informal economy is not Africa’s development strategy

By Siyabonga HadebeSeptember 21, 202612 Mins Read

Africa’s informal economy reflects resilience, but lasting development requires productive jobs, industrialisation and structural reform, writes Siyabonga Hadebe.

Operation Shanela R44 000 theft case puts police integrity on the line

September 21, 2026

Regulator exposes Big 5 Finance for reckless lending and unlawful loan charges

September 21, 2026

Murder-for-payout schemes shake South Africa’s insurance sector amid rising fraud

September 21, 2026
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • WhatsApp
Demo
About Us
About Us

Helping South Africans to navigate the legal landscape; providing accessible legal information; and giving a voice to those seeking justice.

Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube WhatsApp Twitch RSS
Latest posts

Your driving licence at the gate: What estates can actually legally scan

Sponsor: My Estate LifeSeptember 6, 2026

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024
OUR PICKS

Sea Point building plans declared unlawful, but luxury apartment development will continue

September 9, 2026

Suspended attorney ordered to secure LPC legal fees before review proceeds

September 16, 2026

NUMSA ordered to pay member R132,000 after abandoning Labour Court review

September 14, 2026
© 2026 Conviction.
  • Home
  • Buy Now
  • Law & Justice

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Powered by
Necessary cookies enable essential site features like secure log-ins and consent preference adjustments. They do not store personal data.
None
Functional cookies support features like content sharing on social media, collecting feedback, and enabling third-party tools.
None
Analytical cookies track visitor interactions, providing insights on metrics like visitor count, bounce rate, and traffic sources.
None
Advertisement cookies deliver personalized ads based on your previous visits and analyze the effectiveness of ad campaigns.
None
Unclassified cookies are cookies that we are in the process of classifying, together with the providers of individual cookies.
None
Powered by