Skip to content
Close Menu
ConvictionConviction
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

Matric results publication stays public after High Court dismisses appeal by Information Regulator

June 4, 2026

More than maintenance: Rand Water building trust through action

June 3, 2026

Farm for sale advert slammed for misleading jacuzzi, workshop and three-phase power claims

June 3, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trending
  • Matric results publication stays public after High Court dismisses appeal by Information Regulator
  • More than maintenance: Rand Water building trust through action
  • Farm for sale advert slammed for misleading jacuzzi, workshop and three-phase power claims
  • TVET college ordered to apologise for sharing personal information of employees
  • Judge calls for investigation into claims of body corporate capture in Maboneng
  • Company fails bid to escape contract clause buried in terms and conditions
  • Tribunal dismisses Bogdanov’s PhD defence, upholds 10-year JSE ban
  • South Africa cannot afford to lag while youth nicotine addiction escalates
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
ConvictionConviction
Sonneblom
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch
ConvictionConviction
Home » Consumer loses R120 000 after downloading a fake airline ticket app that hijacked their phone
Consumer Protection Law

Consumer loses R120 000 after downloading a fake airline ticket app that hijacked their phone

A fake airline ticket app took over a consumer’s smartphone, showing the dangers of unverified apps and the limits of what banks can do in cases of digital fraud.
Conviction Staff ReporterBy Conviction Staff ReporterNovember 3, 2025Updated:November 3, 2025No Comments
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email
  • A consumer lost R120 000 after she installed a fake app that let criminals access her device and banking details.
  • The bank is not liable, as the unauthorised transactions were conducted using biometric authentication on the consumer’s trusted device, making it appear that the consumer herself approved the payments.
  • Experts urge caution with unfamiliar apps, recommend verifying promotions through official channels, and advise strong passwords and security practices.

A consumer responded to a social media ad promoting discounted airline tickets. She submitted her phone number and email via a link, hoping to receive the advertised promo codes.

Soon after, she was contacted via WhatsApp and told to download an app from the Google Play Store. What seemed like a legitimate app was actually malicious, containing malware that could control her device remotely.

Within minutes, her phone began overheating and behaving erratically. The camera's green light switched on unexpectedly, suggesting remote tampering. When she opened her banking app, she discovered two unauthorised transactions totaling R120 000. Despite reporting the fraud to her bank and the South African Police Service just 27 minutes after the payments, the money had already vanished.

The bank denied responsibility, noting that the payments were authorised via selfie-based biometric authentication on the consumer’s trusted device. When the case was escalated to the National Financial Ombud (NFO), the office found the fraud originated from the malicious app, not a flaw in the bank’s systems.

"The loss came from the consumer’s interaction with a harmful third-party app, not from any fault of the bank," the NFO said. There was no evidence of bank negligence or security failures.

Human impact and lessons for consumers

The consumer called the experience “devastating and shocking,” underscoring how quickly scammers can exploit everyday technology. Experts warn that malware can do more than steal passwords; it can hijack devices, impersonate users, and even bypass biometric security.

The NFO urged consumers to always verify promotions on official websites or verified social media accounts, never share personal details publicly, and only download apps from trusted developers. Strong, unique passwords, two-factor authentication, reliable antivirus software, and regular account monitoring are essential.

The NFO warned, “Even with quick reporting, losses can be permanent if malware has seized control of your device. Always pause, question, and verify before installing any app or sharing personal details.”

Conviction.co.za 

Get your news on the go. Click here to follow the Conviction WhatsApp channel.

bank liability biometric fraud consumer protection Cybercrime mobile app scams
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Conviction Staff Reporter

Conviction.co.za — Towards a Positive Impact on People

Related Posts

Farm for sale advert slammed for misleading jacuzzi, workshop and three-phase power claims

June 3, 2026

Dead wife contradiction forces Nedbank to return repossessed Nissan Navara

May 29, 2026

SCA clears the way for banks to recover unpaid vehicle debt in the High Court

May 23, 2026
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Prove your humanity: 6   +   3   =  

Subscribe to our newsletter:
Top Posts

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024

Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

November 27, 2024

Irregular levy increases, mismanagement, and legal threats in a sectional title scheme

June 2, 2025
Don't Miss
Regulatory Law
5 Mins Read

Matric results publication stays public after High Court dismisses appeal by Information Regulator

By Kennedy MudzuliJune 4, 20265 Mins Read

The Information Regulator has lost its bid to appeal a court ruling that set aside enforcement notices against the Department of Basic Education, leaving the publication of matric results unaffected for now.

More than maintenance: Rand Water building trust through action

June 3, 2026

Farm for sale advert slammed for misleading jacuzzi, workshop and three-phase power claims

June 3, 2026

TVET college ordered to apologise for sharing personal information of employees

June 3, 2026
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • WhatsApp
Demo
About Us
About Us

Helping South Africans to navigate the legal landscape; providing accessible legal information; and giving a voice to those seeking justice.

Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube WhatsApp Twitch RSS
Latest posts

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024

Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

November 27, 2024
OUR PICKS

Agricultural advisors declared scientists in landmark Labour Court ruling

February 17, 2026

R13,914 debt triggers sale of R380 000 home, transfer halted amid execution flaws

April 20, 2026

Understanding employee rights, workplace protections and grievance resolution in South Africa

June 8, 2025
© 2026 Conviction.
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Powered by
►
Necessary cookies enable essential site features like secure log-ins and consent preference adjustments. They do not store personal data.
None
►
Functional cookies support features like content sharing on social media, collecting feedback, and enabling third-party tools.
None
►
Analytical cookies track visitor interactions, providing insights on metrics like visitor count, bounce rate, and traffic sources.
None
►
Advertisement cookies deliver personalized ads based on your previous visits and analyze the effectiveness of ad campaigns.
None
►
Unclassified cookies are cookies that we are in the process of classifying, together with the providers of individual cookies.
None
Powered by