Skip to content
Close Menu
ConvictionConviction
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

Sexual harassment at work: Employer duties, liability and the rights of employees

June 12, 2026

Phumeza Shoba loses maintenance claim after court finds distorted picture of her finances

June 12, 2026

Batohi cannot meddle with enquiry procedures after abandoning testimony, panel rules

June 12, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trending
  • Sexual harassment at work: Employer duties, liability and the rights of employees
  • Phumeza Shoba loses maintenance claim after court finds distorted picture of her finances
  • Batohi cannot meddle with enquiry procedures after abandoning testimony, panel rules
  • Municipality liable for shutting down businesses in R18.6 million damages claim
  • Health Department ordered to repay doctor after unlawful R105,000 salary deduction
  • Intimidating parent ordered to remain 100 metres from Hendrik Louw Primary School
  • Our silent shame: Why South Africans must pay heed to elder abuse
  • Parliament urged to strengthen judicial accountability through wider reforms
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
ConvictionConviction
Sonneblom
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch
ConvictionConviction
Home » Sexual harassment at work: Employer duties, liability and the rights of employees
Employment and Labour Law Series

Sexual harassment at work: Employer duties, liability and the rights of employees

Law expert Ann-Suhet Marx explains employer obligations, workplace liability and the legal remedies available to employees who experience sexual harassment at work.
Ann-Suhet MarxBy Ann-Suhet MarxJune 12, 2026No Comments
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
Ann Suhet Marx examines employer liability and employee rights in sexual harassment at work cases. Picture: magnific.com
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email
  • Sexual harassment can expose employers to significant legal liability if they fail to prevent, investigate or address complaints properly.
  • Employees have access to internal processes, the CCMA, the Labour Court and other legal remedies when workplace harassment occurs.
  • Employers must create safe workplaces through clear policies, prompt investigations and effective support for complainants.

Sexual harassment is one of the worst forms of workplace misconduct because it affects a person’s dignity, safety and ability to participate fully in working life.

I’ve seen the personal and professional damage it causes, and I have also seen how quickly employers expose themselves when they fail to act.

South African labour law places a clear duty on employers: prevent harassment, respond decisively when it occurs, and protect employees from further harm.

What is sexual harassment?

The Code of Good Practice on the Prevention and Elimination of Harassment (2022) defines sexual harassment broadly. It includes unwanted conduct of a sexual nature, whether it be verbal, non-verbal, physical, digital or implied.

It covers quid pro quo harassment, where job benefits are linked to sexual favours, and hostile work environment harassment, where behaviour creates intimidation, humiliation or discomfort. It also extends to online or after-hours conduct, including messages, images or behaviour on digital platforms.

The test is simple: if the behaviour makes a person feel unsafe, violated or humiliated, it may well constitute harassment. Intent is not the determining factor.

‘We didn’t know’ is not a defence

Employers can be held vicariously liable for sexual harassment committed by employees, managers or even third parties such as clients or contractors. Liability arises when the harassment occurs in the course of employment and the employer fails to take reasonable steps to prevent or address it.

In Campbell Scientific Africa (Pty) Ltd v Simmers (2016), the court focused on the legal weight of one-off, after-hours remarks, and that employers cannot use ignorance as a defence. Even when an employee does not report harassment immediately, often because of fear or a power imbalance, the employer may still be liable if they ought to have known and failed to create a safe, responsive environment. This case remains the benchmark for understanding the proactive duty employers carry.

Reasonable steps include a clear, accessible sexual harassment policy, a trusted reporting mechanism, trained managers and a consistent record of acting promptly and fairly.

Reporting duties for employees and employers

Employees can report harassment to a manager, HR, a designated harassment officer, a trade union representative, or directly to the CCMA or a bargaining council if internal processes fail. Reports may be verbal or written, and employers may not ignore informal disclosures.

The matters of Ndlovu v Department of Health and M v Standard Bank highlight the risks to employers of mishandling reports, delaying investigations, retaliating, and failing to provide a safe, compliant workplace. This case involved a nurse who, after reporting ongoing sexual comments from a supervisor, was moved to a less favourable shift pattern.

The court held that this amounted to retaliation, which is a form of unfair discrimination, and further that moving the complainant instead of addressing the perpetrator was unlawful.

Once a complaint is made, employers have to acknowledge it, ensure the employee’s immediate safety, explain the process and available support, maintain confidentiality and initiate an investigation without delay.

Conducting an investigation

A flawed investigation is one of the quickest ways for an employer to lose a case. A proper investigation needs to begin promptly and has to be handled by an impartial investigator, whether internal or external. It should include interviews with the complainant, the accused and relevant witnesses, as well as the collection of digital evidence such as messages, emails, CCTV or access logs.

A trauma-informed approach is essential. The process has to avoid secondary victimisation and must culminate in a written report with findings and recommendations. If the allegations are substantiated, disciplinary action must follow, up to and including dismissal. Even when external investigators are used, accountability remains with the employer.

Remedies available to employees

Employees who experience sexual harassment have several legal avenues available to them:

  • Internal grievance and disciplinary processes: This is often the fastest route for immediate protection.
  • CCMA or bargaining council referral: Sexual harassment is treated as unfair discrimination under the Employment Equity Act. Possible outcomes include compensation of up to 24 months’ remuneration, corrective action orders and, in some cases, reinstatement.
  • Labour Court litigation: This is appropriate where there are serious or systemic failures by the employer.
  • Protection orders under the Protection from Harassment Act: These are useful when harassment continues outside the workplace.
  • Criminal charges: Applicable where the conduct amounts to sexual assault, grooming or intimidation.

Why does this area of law continue to evolve?

The 2022 Code of Good Practice expanded the definition of harassment and strengthened employer duties. Accordingly, the courts are increasingly recognising the power dynamics that silence victims, the psychological impact of harassment and the responsibility of employers to create safe, respectful workplaces.

Recent cases, including those from 2025 and 2026, show a judiciary that is more attuned to trauma, retaliation and the realities of digital harassment.

Employers who treat sexual harassment as a misunderstanding or interpersonal conflict are exposing themselves to serious legal and reputational risk.

Practical guidance for employers

  • Review and update harassment policies annually.
  • Train managers on how to respond to disclosures.
  • Provide anonymous reporting channels.
  • Act immediately when a complaint is made.
  • Document every step taken.
  • Support the complainant throughout the process.

Closing thoughts

Sexual harassment is not just a legal issue. It is a human one too. Employees have the right to dignity, safety and respect at work, and employers have the duty to uphold those rights.

When organisations take sexual harassment seriously, they protect their people, strengthen their culture and safeguard their future.

If you need to consult or have a question on these matters, email ann-suhet@vdm.law or phone 011 394 1606 Ext 105. Questions may also be sent to expert@conviction.co.za

Conviction.co.za

Get your news on the go. Click here to follow the Conviction WhatsApp channel.

employer liability employment law Labour law Sexual harassment at work workplace rights
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Ann-Suhet Marx

Director and Head of Litigation, Van Deventer Dowlath & Marx Incorporated.

Related Posts

Health Department ordered to repay doctor after unlawful R105,000 salary deduction

June 12, 2026

Large animal client connections at heart of Mossel Bay vet’s restraint of trade drama

June 11, 2026

Employees win at CCMA but lose in court after failing to explain a four-year delay

June 11, 2026
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Prove your humanity: 7   +   8   =  

Subscribe to our newsletter:
Top Posts

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024

Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

November 27, 2024

Irregular levy increases, mismanagement, and legal threats in a sectional title scheme

June 2, 2025
Don't Miss
Employment and Labour Law Series
6 Mins Read

Sexual harassment at work: Employer duties, liability and the rights of employees

By Ann-Suhet MarxJune 12, 20266 Mins Read

Sexual harassment at work carries serious consequences for both employees and employers. Ann Suhet Marx examines employer duties, workplace liability and the legal remedies available to victims under South African law.

Phumeza Shoba loses maintenance claim after court finds distorted picture of her finances

June 12, 2026

Batohi cannot meddle with enquiry procedures after abandoning testimony, panel rules

June 12, 2026

Municipality liable for shutting down businesses in R18.6 million damages claim

June 12, 2026
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • WhatsApp
Demo
About Us
About Us

Helping South Africans to navigate the legal landscape; providing accessible legal information; and giving a voice to those seeking justice.

Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube WhatsApp Twitch RSS
Latest posts

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024

Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

November 27, 2024
OUR PICKS

Agricultural advisors declared scientists in landmark Labour Court ruling

February 17, 2026

Standard Bank tops banking complaints list as NFO recovers R442.9 million for consumers

June 6, 2026

FSCA imposes R5.39 million in penalties on financial services firms

June 5, 2026
© 2026 Conviction.
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Powered by
►
Necessary cookies enable essential site features like secure log-ins and consent preference adjustments. They do not store personal data.
None
►
Functional cookies support features like content sharing on social media, collecting feedback, and enabling third-party tools.
None
►
Analytical cookies track visitor interactions, providing insights on metrics like visitor count, bounce rate, and traffic sources.
None
►
Advertisement cookies deliver personalized ads based on your previous visits and analyze the effectiveness of ad campaigns.
None
►
Unclassified cookies are cookies that we are in the process of classifying, together with the providers of individual cookies.
None
Powered by