Skip to content
Close Menu
ConvictionConviction
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

Restraint of trade: Where contract, competition and constitutional rights intersect

July 10, 2026

Department failed to hear farmers before granting 20-year water licence for Lambert’s Bay

July 10, 2026

Motor dealer duped into paying R220,000 for non-existent vehicle sale

July 10, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trending
  • Restraint of trade: Where contract, competition and constitutional rights intersect
  • Department failed to hear farmers before granting 20-year water licence for Lambert’s Bay
  • Motor dealer duped into paying R220,000 for non-existent vehicle sale
  • Renowned advocate Moafrika Wa Maila says group demanded his ID in Pretoria
  • Unisa must issue amended LLB certificate to graduate who lawfully changed surname
  • No driver’s licence, no job: South Africa’s quiet barrier to youth employment
  • Email seeking lower house price costs buyers R224,952 despite signed agreement
  • Judge rejects woman’s bid to validate disputed Will signed by thumbprint
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
ConvictionConviction
Sonneblom
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch
ConvictionConviction
Home » Department failed to hear farmers before granting 20-year water licence for Lambert’s Bay
Environmental Law

Department failed to hear farmers before granting 20-year water licence for Lambert’s Bay

A judge found that affected landowners should have been allowed to oppose a groundwater licence before it was approved for Cederberg Municipality.
Kennedy MudzuliBy Kennedy MudzuliJuly 10, 2026Updated:July 10, 2026No Comments
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
A judge found the Department of Water and Sanitation should have heard affected farmers before granting a long term groundwater licence.
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email
  • Department granted a 20-year water use licence without listening to affected farmers.
  • Landowners successfully challenged the approval after being excluded from the decision-making process.
  • The municipality can submit a new application while the current licence stays temporarily valid

Farmers who challenged the Department of Water and Sanitation's decision to grant Cederberg Municipality a long-term water use licence have won a significant legal victory after a judge found they were denied an opportunity to be heard before the licence was approved.

The High Court in the Western Cape ruled that the department acted unfairly when it granted the municipality permission to abstract groundwater from three boreholes on privately owned farmland near Lambert's Bay without first notifying the affected landowners or inviting them to make representations.

The licence, granted in March 2023, allows the municipality to abstract a combined 567 648 cubic metres of groundwater each year for 20 years.

Farmers challenge licence process

The applicants, the trustees of the ISW Van Zyl Trust and neighbouring farmer Hendrick Gideon Louw, approached the court after discovering that the licence had already been issued even though the boreholes are situated on their land.

The municipality had previously drawn groundwater from the boreholes under agreements with the landowners. Those agreements expired after the parties failed to agree on new compensation, but the municipality continued abstracting water while applying for a long-term water use licence.

The farmers argued that the department should never have approved the application without first consulting them and considering the effect continued groundwater abstraction could have on their farming operations.

Judge finds farmers were denied a fair hearing

Justice M Sher agreed, finding that the department failed to follow a fair administrative process before granting the licence.

The judge said, "A responsible authority may not dispense with a landowner's consent without them being notified of the application and being given a reasonable opportunity to make representations or submissions."

The department argued that the farmers were not entitled to be consulted because they were not registered lawful water users.

The court rejected that argument, holding that ownership of the land gave the applicants a direct interest in the licence application and that they should have been allowed to participate in the decision-making process.

Justice Sher said, "The responsible authority's failure to provide the applicants with a reasonable opportunity to make representations constituted a breach of the applicants' rights to procedurally fair administrative action."

Groundwater concerns should have been considered

The farmers also argued that continued groundwater abstraction had already affected their farming activities. They said several boreholes had failed since 2021, and increasing salinity had reduced water quality.

The court found that these concerns were relevant to the licence application and should have been considered before the department reached its decision.

Justice Sher said, "Common sense and fairness dictate that before granting a water use licence these steps should have been taken."

The judgment also noted that other nearby groundwater users may have been affected and should be considered if a fresh application is submitted.

Fresh application may be submitted

The court reviewed and set aside the water use licence but suspended its order for 18 months, or until the Department of Water and Sanitation decides a fresh application, whichever happens first.

This means the municipality may continue abstracting groundwater for Lambert's Bay while a new application is processed. If the municipality reapplies, the department must notify the affected farmers and consider any representations they make before deciding whether to grant another water use licence.

The respondents were ordered to pay the applicants' legal costs, including the costs of two counsel.

Conviction.co.za

Get your news on the go. Click here to follow the Conviction WhatsApp channel.

Department of Water and Sanitation farmers groundwater Lambert's Bay water use licence
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Kennedy Mudzuli

Multiple award-winner with passion for news and training young journalists. Founder and editor of Conviction.co.za

Related Posts

Judge dismisses challenge to Stellenbosch development, upholds environmental approvals

July 2, 2026

SAHRC finds racial discrimination at Hartbeespoort

November 27, 2025

Mpumalanga High Court grants leave to appeal in Barberton Makhonjwa Mountains Heritage Site dispute

September 30, 2025
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Prove your humanity: 2   +   1   =  

Subscribe to our newsletter:
Top Posts

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024

Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

November 27, 2024

Irregular levy increases, mismanagement, and legal threats in a sectional title scheme

June 2, 2025
Don't Miss
Employment and Labour Law Series
8 Mins Read

Restraint of trade: Where contract, competition and constitutional rights intersect

By Ann-Suhet MarxJuly 10, 20268 Mins Read

Restraint of trade agreements remain enforceable in South Africa, but only where employers can prove a legitimate business interest. Ann-Suhet Marx explores how the courts balance contractual freedom, competition and employees’ constitutional right to work in the digital age.

Department failed to hear farmers before granting 20-year water licence for Lambert’s Bay

July 10, 2026

Motor dealer duped into paying R220,000 for non-existent vehicle sale

July 10, 2026

Renowned advocate Moafrika Wa Maila says group demanded his ID in Pretoria

July 10, 2026
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • WhatsApp
Demo
About Us
About Us

Helping South Africans to navigate the legal landscape; providing accessible legal information; and giving a voice to those seeking justice.

Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube WhatsApp Twitch RSS
Latest posts

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024

Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

November 27, 2024
OUR PICKS

Trustees clamp down on Airbnb rentals pending owners’ final decision at February AGM

July 7, 2026

Foreign national married to South African wins citizenship, Home Affairs found in contempt

July 3, 2026

Labour Court says CCMA cannot block expert evidence in workplace alcohol dismissal disputes

July 3, 2026
© 2026 Conviction.
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Powered by
►
Necessary cookies enable essential site features like secure log-ins and consent preference adjustments. They do not store personal data.
None
►
Functional cookies support features like content sharing on social media, collecting feedback, and enabling third-party tools.
None
►
Analytical cookies track visitor interactions, providing insights on metrics like visitor count, bounce rate, and traffic sources.
None
►
Advertisement cookies deliver personalized ads based on your previous visits and analyze the effectiveness of ad campaigns.
None
►
Unclassified cookies are cookies that we are in the process of classifying, together with the providers of individual cookies.
None
Powered by