Skip to content
Close Menu
ConvictionConviction
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

What two weeks defending 26 accused taught me about law, life, and resilience

August 3, 2026

R112,000 hospital bill reduced to R750, allowing refugee child’s body to be released for burial

August 3, 2026

SA’s digital infrastructure makes it a prime target for organised cybercrime, INTERPOL warns

August 3, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trending
  • What two weeks defending 26 accused taught me about law, life, and resilience
  • R112,000 hospital bill reduced to R750, allowing refugee child’s body to be released for burial
  • SA’s digital infrastructure makes it a prime target for organised cybercrime, INTERPOL warns
  • Judge rules marriage stayed in community of property despite postnuptial contract
  • DJ Skhu honours his father’s memory through deeply personal album ‘Emakhosini’
  • Employee loses court bid to overturn Santam dismissal linked to COVID workplace policy
  • Judge says ‘bobbejaan’ comment not racist, likely referred to technical problems
  • High Court ends Bloemfontein-only filing rule for Supreme Court of Appeal cases
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
ConvictionConviction
Sonneblom
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch
ConvictionConviction
Home » SAHRC finds racial discrimination at Hartbeespoort
Human Rights

SAHRC finds racial discrimination at Hartbeespoort

The Commission ruled the Department of Water and Sanitation violated the rights of black applicants.
Kennedy MudzuliBy Kennedy MudzuliNovember 27, 2025Updated:November 27, 2025No Comments
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
A report by the South African Human Rights Commission has exposed racial discrimination in Hartbeespoort, ruling that black applicants were denied equality and dignity in access to state‑owned shoreline land.
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email
  • Black applicants were systematically excluded from shoreline leases despite making most of the applications.
  • The Department of Water and Sanitation found to have breached rights to equality and dignity through unfair lease practices.
  • Madibeng Municipality criticised for poor management, failure to enforce by-laws and inaction on land use.

The South African Human Rights Commission has delivered its final investigative report into allegations of racial discrimination in Hartbeespoort, confirming that black applicants were systematically excluded from leasing state-owned land along the dam shoreline.

The complaint came from the Hartbeespoort Community Development Initiative, which represents black residents. They argued that their applications to lease land were ignored, while white occupants continued to benefit. The Commission found that, until recently, the majority of lease applications came from black applicants, yet only one was approved, compared to two approvals for white applicants and one for a mixed-race entity.

According to the report, the Department of Water and Sanitation violated constitutional rights by prioritising existing, mostly white occupants, and revoking Permissions to Occupy without fair processes. The Commission stated that, by revoking Permissions to Occupy without due process, the Department of Water and Sanitation violated the applicants’ rights to equality, dignity, and fair administrative action.

Failures of Madibeng

Women, especially black women, were found to be disproportionately left out of the dam economy. The Commission underlined that this exclusion represents indirect racial and gender discrimination, contradicting the Department’s duty to promote change.

The investigation also uncovered poor management by Madibeng Local Municipality. “The Commission observed that Madibeng failed to process planning and licensing applications, finalise and enforce by-laws, and fulfil commitments to conduct land audits,” the report reads. “These shortcomings, while not racially motivated, worsened tensions, hindered legitimate businesses, and undermined progress in Hartbeespoort.”

Black residents told the Commission that white occupants were allowed to develop properties without the required permissions, while black businesses faced harassment and unfair scrutiny. One resident described this as the misuse of noise complaints against black establishments, while white venues that caused noise were ignored.

Racial tensions and violence

The investigation took place amid rising racial tensions in the town. The burning of Bubbles, a black-owned recreational venue, deepened the divisions. The owner, Thabiso Mathibedi, claimed that unnamed white residents were responsible. Although the Commission could not support the arson claims, due to a lack of evidence, it noted that the incident increased mistrust and hostility.

Stakeholder discussions revealed deep rifts. Black residents talked about historical racial bias in land allocation and racially motivated physical attacks. White residents denied systemic racism, attributing the tensions to management failures, and feeling frustrated at being labelled as racist.

Police allegations

The Commission also looked into claims that the South African Police Service was involved in racial bias. While black residents asserted that SAPS did not investigate complaints against white residents, the Commission found that allegations of systemic racism against SAPS were unproven. SAPS provided evidence of ongoing investigations and prosecutions, including the conviction of a white resident for pointing a firearm at a black neighbour.

Commission directives

In its directives, the Commission ordered the Department of Water and Sanitation to finalise its updated lease policy and transformation plan, process pending applications, review previously cancelled Permissions to Occupy, and conduct a full audit to regularise occupancy.

Madibeng Municipality was told to clear its backlog of planning and business licence applications, finalise and publish outstanding by-laws, develop a transformation plan for Hartbeespoort, and ensure fair enforcement of regulations.

The Commission warned that failure to comply could lead to legal action. It concluded that these measures are essential to tackle deep-rooted exclusion, promote true equality, and restore trust in public institutions.

Conviction.co.za

Get your news on the go. Click here to follow the Conviction WhatsApp channel.

Department of Water and Sanitation Hartbeespoort Madibeng Municipality racial discrimination SAHRC
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Kennedy Mudzuli

Multiple award-winner with passion for news and training young journalists. Founder and editor of Conviction.co.za

Related Posts

R112,000 hospital bill reduced to R750, allowing refugee child’s body to be released for burial

August 3, 2026

Justice O’Regan honoured for defending human rights and constitutional democracy

August 2, 2026

Government begins Angola mission to bring home remains of South African liberation fighters

July 31, 2026
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Prove your humanity: 7   +   10   =  

Subscribe to our newsletter:
Top Posts

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024

Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

November 27, 2024

Irregular levy increases, mismanagement, and legal threats in a sectional title scheme

June 2, 2025
Don't Miss
Opinion
4 Mins Read

What two weeks defending 26 accused taught me about law, life, and resilience

By Moafrika Wa MailaAugust 3, 20264 Mins Read

After two weeks defending 26 accused during sentencing in a major copper cable theft case, the author reflects on mitigation, resilience, preparation and why giving your all matters more than simply winning in court.

R112,000 hospital bill reduced to R750, allowing refugee child’s body to be released for burial

August 3, 2026

SA’s digital infrastructure makes it a prime target for organised cybercrime, INTERPOL warns

August 3, 2026

Judge rules marriage stayed in community of property despite postnuptial contract

August 3, 2026
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • WhatsApp
Demo
About Us
About Us

Helping South Africans to navigate the legal landscape; providing accessible legal information; and giving a voice to those seeking justice.

Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube WhatsApp Twitch RSS
Latest posts

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024

Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

November 27, 2024
OUR PICKS

Legal Practice Council ordered to disclose records behind English-only admission exams

July 28, 2026

Attorney who briefs advocate remains liable for fees unless agreement states otherwise

July 30, 2026

R112,000 hospital bill reduced to R750, allowing refugee child’s body to be released for burial

August 3, 2026
© 2026 Conviction.
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Powered by
►
Necessary cookies enable essential site features like secure log-ins and consent preference adjustments. They do not store personal data.
None
►
Functional cookies support features like content sharing on social media, collecting feedback, and enabling third-party tools.
None
►
Analytical cookies track visitor interactions, providing insights on metrics like visitor count, bounce rate, and traffic sources.
None
►
Advertisement cookies deliver personalized ads based on your previous visits and analyze the effectiveness of ad campaigns.
None
►
Unclassified cookies are cookies that we are in the process of classifying, together with the providers of individual cookies.
None
Powered by