Skip to content
Close Menu
ConvictionConviction
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

What two weeks defending 26 accused taught me about law, life, and resilience

August 3, 2026

R112,000 hospital bill reduced to R750, allowing refugee child’s body to be released for burial

August 3, 2026

SA’s digital infrastructure makes it a prime target for organised cybercrime, INTERPOL warns

August 3, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trending
  • What two weeks defending 26 accused taught me about law, life, and resilience
  • R112,000 hospital bill reduced to R750, allowing refugee child’s body to be released for burial
  • SA’s digital infrastructure makes it a prime target for organised cybercrime, INTERPOL warns
  • Judge rules marriage stayed in community of property despite postnuptial contract
  • DJ Skhu honours his father’s memory through deeply personal album ‘Emakhosini’
  • Employee loses court bid to overturn Santam dismissal linked to COVID workplace policy
  • Judge says ‘bobbejaan’ comment not racist, likely referred to technical problems
  • High Court ends Bloemfontein-only filing rule for Supreme Court of Appeal cases
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
ConvictionConviction
Sonneblom
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch
ConvictionConviction
Home » Law expert Khomotso Makapane advises on casino employee’s workplace injury and denied compensation
Ask The Expert

Law expert Khomotso Makapane advises on casino employee’s workplace injury and denied compensation

Understanding workplace injury claims, legal rights, compensation, and next steps for staff members
Conviction ExpertBy Conviction ExpertMay 21, 2025Updated:May 21, 2025No Comments
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
Labour law expert Khomotso Makapane, a partner at Bowmans. Picture: Supplied
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

Dear Conviction, 

I work in a casino, and on 15 May 2023, I slipped and fell while on duty. My colleague and I reported the incident twice, but the manager on duty ignored her. 

Later, I reported it again to the Health and Safety Manager, who was at the branch. I would like to know if I still have a chance to sue my employer for violating my rights, as I was made to work the entire day until the nightshift staff arrived. 

My injury was never reported to the Labour Department. The hospital sent my X-ray account to our HR department because they had requested a claim number from my employer, but my employer failed to respond. As a result, I am still owing the X-ray consultant fees. The hospital sent the invoice to the HR department, but they continued to ignore it. I escalated the matter to my union, and my branch manager promised the union that she would handle the issue, but that turned out to be a lie. 

I reported the matter to the Workmen’s Compensation Fund and was assured that the Labour Department was still investigating. However, to this day, nothing has been done. I asked my branch manager to assist me by consulting our HR department so they could cover the cost of another doctor’s visit, as I am still unwell. She refused and told me to pay with my own money. Since 2023, I have been attending a public hospital, and to this day, I am still receiving treatment in the spine department. 

Workplace injury compensation should be a guaranteed right, but my experience has shown otherwise. My rights were severely violated, first, by failing to report my injury on duty, and second, by refusing to pay for my X-ray bill despite my possession of a WCI2 form proving that it was an injury on duty. They failed me. 

What pains me most is that I was not the only person who slipped and fell that day. A customer also slipped and fell in the same spot. Yet, they did nothing to assist her, not even to take her to a doctor. The only thing they gave her was a can of Coke. 

Khomotso Makapane, a labour law expert, provided advice: 

It is not clear from the query when the incident and employer’s conduct were referred to the Compensation Fund, given that the accident took place in May 2023. To this end, the next steps will largely depend on the timing of the claim. 

As a general principle, the Compensation Fund provides compensation for workers who get hurt at work, or sick from diseases contracted at work, or for death because of these injuries or diseases. The Compensation Fund is governed by the Compensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases Act (No 130 of 1993) (COIDA) and its amendment (No 61 of 1997). 

An employee can claim from the Fund if they are injured in an accident that occurs while performing their work duties, these are called accidents that happen ‘in the course and scope of duty.’ However, claims must be made within 12 months of the accident, death, or disease diagnosis. 

Employees who are injured or contract diseases while on the job must report the incident to their employer within seven days. The employer must then report the incident to the Compensation Fund within 14 days. If the employer fails to do so, the employee can submit a claim directly to the Compensation Fund. The Fund will then investigate the claim and determine whether compensation is payable. 

The processing time for a claim varies depending on its complexity and the availability of supporting documentation. Generally, the Compensation Fund aims to process claims within 120 days of receiving all necessary information. If the Fund is not dealing with your claim, first ensure that you have provided all required documentation and reported the incident within the prescribed timeframe.  

If the issue persists, you can file a complaint with the Compensation Commissioner, seek legal advice, and consider taking legal action against your employer if they are not fulfilling their obligations. You may also contact the Department of Labour, as they can assist with enforcing COIDA if the employer refuses to pay. 

Under COIDA, employees are generally not permitted to sue their employer for work-related injuries or diseases. The Act provides a no-fault compensation system, meaning that employees are entitled to compensation regardless of who was at fault for the incident. However, exceptions exist in cases of intentional harm or gross negligence. Workers who are not covered by COIDA may be able to claim compensation through common law or other statutory schemes. Seeking legal advice is recommended to explore your options. 

Makapane is a partner at Bowmans. He can be reached at kmakapane@icloud.com

Justice explained. Rights unlocked. Answers you can trust.

#Conviction

Get your news on the go. Click here to follow the Conviction WhatsApp channel     

casino worker COIDA compensation claim employee rights Employer Negligence Labour law legal advice occupational health and safety workmen’s compensation workplace injury workplace justice
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Conviction Expert

Justice explained. Rights unlocked. Answers you can trust.

Related Posts

Hybrid work, surveillance software and the new boundary lines of employee privacy

July 31, 2026

Screenshots are not evidence: The new frontier of unfair dismissal in South Africa

July 24, 2026

Employer loses restraint of trade case after failing to get agreement signed

July 20, 2026
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Prove your humanity: 2   +   1   =  

Subscribe to our newsletter:
Top Posts

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024

Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

November 27, 2024

Irregular levy increases, mismanagement, and legal threats in a sectional title scheme

June 2, 2025
Don't Miss
Opinion
4 Mins Read

What two weeks defending 26 accused taught me about law, life, and resilience

By Moafrika Wa MailaAugust 3, 20264 Mins Read

After two weeks defending 26 accused during sentencing in a major copper cable theft case, the author reflects on mitigation, resilience, preparation and why giving your all matters more than simply winning in court.

R112,000 hospital bill reduced to R750, allowing refugee child’s body to be released for burial

August 3, 2026

SA’s digital infrastructure makes it a prime target for organised cybercrime, INTERPOL warns

August 3, 2026

Judge rules marriage stayed in community of property despite postnuptial contract

August 3, 2026
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • WhatsApp
Demo
About Us
About Us

Helping South Africans to navigate the legal landscape; providing accessible legal information; and giving a voice to those seeking justice.

Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube WhatsApp Twitch RSS
Latest posts

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024

Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

November 27, 2024
OUR PICKS

Legal Practice Council ordered to disclose records behind English-only admission exams

July 28, 2026

Labour Court halts UCT consultation process that could defeat pending whistleblower trial

July 28, 2026

Attorney who briefs advocate remains liable for fees unless agreement states otherwise

July 30, 2026
© 2026 Conviction.
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Powered by
►
Necessary cookies enable essential site features like secure log-ins and consent preference adjustments. They do not store personal data.
None
►
Functional cookies support features like content sharing on social media, collecting feedback, and enabling third-party tools.
None
►
Analytical cookies track visitor interactions, providing insights on metrics like visitor count, bounce rate, and traffic sources.
None
►
Advertisement cookies deliver personalized ads based on your previous visits and analyze the effectiveness of ad campaigns.
None
►
Unclassified cookies are cookies that we are in the process of classifying, together with the providers of individual cookies.
None
Powered by