Skip to content
Close Menu
ConvictionConviction
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

Reinstatement award set aside after arbitrator mishandles evidence and misapplies law

October 16, 2026

RAF challenges ruling protecting indigent claimants unable to pay medical costs upfront

October 16, 2026

SAHRC vs Lagardien: The sign came down, but the principle stays up

October 15, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trending
  • Reinstatement award set aside after arbitrator mishandles evidence and misapplies law
  • RAF challenges ruling protecting indigent claimants unable to pay medical costs upfront
  • SAHRC vs Lagardien: The sign came down, but the principle stays up
  • Dealership ordered to refund R323,950 for faulty car advertised in ‘excellent condition’
  • Lease, R228 million tender and assassination plots in Matlala’s mounting legal battles
  • Elections analyst surprised but not shocked by ANC ballot ruling, Terry Tselane defends IEC
  • Fraud conviction set aside due to unregistered candidate attorney’s role in trial
  • Moepya commits IEC to ANC ballot changes and pledges review of nomination rules
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
ConvictionConviction
Sonneblom
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch
ConvictionConviction
Home » KZN mother wins custody battle to keep siblings, aged 3 and 7, together
Law & Justice

KZN mother wins custody battle to keep siblings, aged 3 and 7, together

Kennedy MudzuliBy Kennedy MudzuliMarch 13, 2025Updated:March 13, 2025No Comments
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
While the court environment can seem intimidating, it’s essential to realize that provisions are in place to protect your rights.
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

The KwaZulu-Natal High Court in Pietermaritzburg has reunited two separated siblings, aged 3 and 7, under their mother's care.

Since the breakdown of their parents' tumultuous marriage as well as a history of separation and substance abuse that complicated parenting arrangements, the children had been living apart. One child lived with his father in Johannesburg while the other remained in Pietermaritzburg with the mother.

The court heard that the father initially moved to Johannesburg with the child, intending for the family to reunite there. However, the mother decided against relocating, and a subsequent application led to the controversial custody trial.

Judge J Mossop evaluated various testimonies, including psychological assessments and evidence from family members, to determine what arrangement would serve the best interests of the children. The judge noted that maintaining a sibling bond was crucial during formative years and highlighted the detrimental effects of separating siblings.

Testimonies presented in court included psychological assessments from witnesses, including clinical psychologist, who initially recommended placing the children under the care of their father. Still, the court later found substantial inconsistencies and inaccuracies in her evaluation as it had been based on outdated information.

The mother's testimony was fundamentally strong, reflected an authentic commitment to the children's welfare, and was deemed credible by the court due to her consistent presence in the children's lives. She articulated a willingness to prioritise  emotional stability of the children over her interests.

In the ruling, Judge Mossop ultimately concluded that both children should reside with their mother. The order also detailed specific arrangements for contact between the father and both children, allowing structured visitation over weekends and school holidays.

#Conviction 
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Kennedy Mudzuli

Multiple award-winner with passion for news and training young journalists. Founder and editor of Conviction.co.za

Related Posts

Reinstatement award set aside after arbitrator mishandles evidence and misapplies law

October 16, 2026

RAF challenges ruling protecting indigent claimants unable to pay medical costs upfront

October 16, 2026

Dealership ordered to refund R323,950 for faulty car advertised in ‘excellent condition’

October 15, 2026
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Prove your humanity: 1   +   2   =  

Subscribe to our newsletter:
Top Posts

Your driving licence at the gate: What estates can actually legally scan

Sponsor: My Estate LifeSeptember 6, 2026

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024

Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

November 27, 2024
Don't Miss
Labour Law
4 Mins Read

Reinstatement award set aside after arbitrator mishandles evidence and misapplies law

By Kennedy MudzuliOctober 16, 20264 Mins Read

The Labour Court has set aside an arbitration award ordering the reinstatement of Ernest Sibaya,…

RAF challenges ruling protecting indigent claimants unable to pay medical costs upfront

October 16, 2026

SAHRC vs Lagardien: The sign came down, but the principle stays up

October 15, 2026

Dealership ordered to refund R323,950 for faulty car advertised in ‘excellent condition’

October 15, 2026
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • WhatsApp
Demo
About Us
About Us

Helping South Africans to navigate the legal landscape; providing accessible legal information; and giving a voice to those seeking justice.

Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube WhatsApp Twitch RSS
Latest posts

Your driving licence at the gate: What estates can actually legally scan

Sponsor: My Estate LifeSeptember 6, 2026

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024
OUR PICKS

APRAV welcomes new RAF boss and rejects Road Accident Benefit Scheme revival plan

October 9, 2026

Business owner ordered to pay R200,000 for banning LGBTQ+ people from his shop

October 11, 2026

Tenant who withheld R1.4 million in rent, citing maintenance failures, ordered to leave property

October 13, 2026
© 2026 Conviction.
  • Home
  • Buy Now
  • Law & Justice

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Powered by
Necessary cookies enable essential site features like secure log-ins and consent preference adjustments. They do not store personal data.
None
Functional cookies support features like content sharing on social media, collecting feedback, and enabling third-party tools.
None
Analytical cookies track visitor interactions, providing insights on metrics like visitor count, bounce rate, and traffic sources.
None
Advertisement cookies deliver personalized ads based on your previous visits and analyze the effectiveness of ad campaigns.
None
Unclassified cookies are cookies that we are in the process of classifying, together with the providers of individual cookies.
None
Powered by