Skip to content
Close Menu
ConvictionConviction
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

More than maintenance: Rand Water building trust through action

June 3, 2026

Farm for sale advert slammed for misleading jacuzzi, workshop and three-phase power claims

June 3, 2026

TVET college ordered to apologise for sharing personal information of employees

June 3, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trending
  • More than maintenance: Rand Water building trust through action
  • Farm for sale advert slammed for misleading jacuzzi, workshop and three-phase power claims
  • TVET college ordered to apologise for sharing personal information of employees
  • Judge calls for investigation into claims of body corporate capture in Maboneng
  • Company fails bid to escape contract clause buried in terms and conditions
  • Tribunal dismisses Bogdanov’s PhD defence, upholds 10-year JSE ban
  • South Africa cannot afford to lag while youth nicotine addiction escalates
  • Evicted Durban tenants win urgent court order pending eviction challenge
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
ConvictionConviction
Sonneblom
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch
ConvictionConviction
Home » Labour Court reinstates four nurses fired after community outcry over baby’s death
Labour Law

Labour Court reinstates four nurses fired after community outcry over baby’s death

Judge finds MEC acted unfairly in refusing to reinstate nurses who feared returning to a hostile clinic after a newborn’s death.
Kennedy MudzuliBy Kennedy MudzuliSeptember 16, 2025No Comments
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
Limpopo Health MEC Dieketseng Mashego has been ordered to reinstate four nurses at Tshino Clinic.
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email
  • The Labour Court overturned the dismissal of four Limpopo nurses, finding they were unfairly let go after refusing to return to a clinic where they faced threats and trauma following a baby’s death. 
  • The nurses provided medical evidence of their stress and safety fears, acting in good faith through their union, but the Department and MEC failed to accommodate their concerns. 
  • The court ruled the MEC’s refusal to reinstate them was irrational and ordered their immediate return to work, without back pay for the absence period. 

The Johannesburg Labour Court has ordered the reinstatement of four professional nurses dismissed after they refused to return to Tshino Clinic in Limpopo’s Vhembe District, where they were confronted by a deeply distressed and angry community.  

The saga began in December 2018, when a newborn tragically died during birth at the clinic. Grief and outrage swept the area, with some community members blaming the nurses for the loss. 

In response to the volatile situation, the Department of Health precautionarily transferred the nurses to other clinics while an investigation took place. No wrongdoing was found. In March 2020, the Department and the Health and Other Services Personnel Trade Union of South Africa (HOSPERSA) agreed that the nurses would return to Tshino Clinic on 1 April 2020. 

Fear, trauma, and isolation keep nurses away 

By that time, the nurses were deeply traumatised. The community’s grief and anger had not subsided, and the environment at Tshino Clinic remained hostile and unwelcoming. Some residents had even made threats against the nurses, and the idea of returning to the clinic filled them with dread and anxiety. 

Seeking help, the nurses consulted both a general practitioner and a psychologist, who both advised that it was unsafe for them to go back. They were diagnosed with stress-related illnesses and provided with medical certificates for the relevant period in May 2020. Psychological reports echoed the need for their safety, recommending they be placed at other facilities. 

The nurses later explained that their absence was not a sign of rebellion, but a necessary step to protect their mental and physical health. They submitted their medical certificates through HOSPERSA shop stewards, believing they were following workplace protocol and relying on their union to advocate for them. 

MEC’s refusal to reinstate found irrational 

Despite these medical recommendations, the Department of Health instructed the nurses on 11 May 2020 to report for duty at Tshino Clinic. When they did not comply, the department deemed them absent without permission for over a month. Under section 17(3)(a)(i) of the Public Service Act, this meant they were automatically considered dismissed from the public service. 

HOSPERSA, the union, applied to the Limpopo MEC for Health to have the nurses reinstated as allowed under the Act, though the application was submitted late. After a delay of more than seven months, the MEC rejected the application in March 2021, blaming the union for mishandling the process and insisting that the nurses should have submitted their medical certificates themselves, not via shop stewards. 

The Labour Court found the MEC’s decision both irrational and legally unsound. Acting Judge C De Witt ruled that the MEC had failed to show why the nurses’ continued employment would be intolerable, which is the critical standard required by law. The court emphasised that the nurses had acted in good faith, following the advice of their union, and were never told that their medical certificates were rejected or that they were still expected to report for duty. 

Court grants reinstatement and recognises workers’ plight 

Although the review application was late, the court granted condonation, highlighting that the MEC had delayed his own decision by over seven months and that there was no opposition to the review. Judge De Witt emphasised that the nurses’ dismissal could have been avoided if the Department had fairly addressed their legitimate fears for safety and their mental health struggles. 

“A reasonable and fair-minded decision maker… could appreciate that fairness dictated that termination of the employment of the applicants ought to be reversed,” he wrote. 

The court ordered the nurses’ immediate reinstatement on their previous terms and conditions, though without back pay for the period between June 2020 and March 2021. 

For these four nurses, the judgment marks the end of a long ordeal. After months of stigma, sleepless nights, and the fear of returning to a hostile environment, they can finally resume their calling with their reputations restored and their dignity intact. 

Conviction.co.za 

Get your news on the go. Click here to follow the Conviction WhatsApp channel.     

Court Judgments Health Workers Labour law public service workplace justice
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Kennedy Mudzuli

Multiple award-winner with passion for news and training young journalists. Founder and editor of Conviction.co.za

Related Posts

Pension fund withdrawal benefits are determined by rules, not contributions

June 2, 2026

Teachers win compensation after decade of rolling contracts ruled unlawful

June 2, 2026

Constitutional Court clears path for retrenched workers to approach Labour Court directly

June 1, 2026
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Prove your humanity: 5   +   7   =  

Subscribe to our newsletter:
Top Posts

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024

Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

November 27, 2024

Irregular levy increases, mismanagement, and legal threats in a sectional title scheme

June 2, 2025
Don't Miss
Opinion
5 Mins Read

More than maintenance: Rand Water building trust through action

By Professor Anja Du PlessisJune 3, 20265 Mins Read

Prof Anja du Plessis argues that Rand Water’s recent maintenance programme demonstrates how planning, transparency and collaboration can strengthen public trust while securing Gauteng’s long-term water supply.

Farm for sale advert slammed for misleading jacuzzi, workshop and three-phase power claims

June 3, 2026

TVET college ordered to apologise for sharing personal information of employees

June 3, 2026

Judge calls for investigation into claims of body corporate capture in Maboneng

June 3, 2026
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • WhatsApp
Demo
About Us
About Us

Helping South Africans to navigate the legal landscape; providing accessible legal information; and giving a voice to those seeking justice.

Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube WhatsApp Twitch RSS
Latest posts

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024

Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

November 27, 2024
OUR PICKS

R13,914 debt triggers sale of R380 000 home, transfer halted amid execution flaws

April 20, 2026

Understanding employee rights, workplace protections and grievance resolution in South Africa

June 8, 2025

Agricultural advisors declared scientists in landmark Labour Court ruling

February 17, 2026
© 2026 Conviction.
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Powered by
►
Necessary cookies enable essential site features like secure log-ins and consent preference adjustments. They do not store personal data.
None
►
Functional cookies support features like content sharing on social media, collecting feedback, and enabling third-party tools.
None
►
Analytical cookies track visitor interactions, providing insights on metrics like visitor count, bounce rate, and traffic sources.
None
►
Advertisement cookies deliver personalized ads based on your previous visits and analyze the effectiveness of ad campaigns.
None
►
Unclassified cookies are cookies that we are in the process of classifying, together with the providers of individual cookies.
None
Powered by