Skip to content
Close Menu
ConvictionConviction
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

Judge Pillay’s jurisprudence in defence of the oppressed and the Nobel Peace Prize

October 11, 2026

KFC’s ‘Only this Friday’ advert misled customers about meal deal availability dates

October 11, 2026

Business owner ordered to pay R200,000 for banning LGBTQ+ people from his shop

October 11, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trending
  • Judge Pillay’s jurisprudence in defence of the oppressed and the Nobel Peace Prize
  • KFC’s ‘Only this Friday’ advert misled customers about meal deal availability dates
  • Business owner ordered to pay R200,000 for banning LGBTQ+ people from his shop
  • Prima Facie: When the system you serve turns and eats you without warning
  • Don’t call me resilient: Why unemployed youth need support, not praise for coping
  • Ramaphosa, Kubayi and Justice Maya congratulate Judge Pillay on Nobel Peace Prize
  • Do not ask Soweto to ‘Siyazenzela’ the State’s school maintenance job, argues Sandile Memela
  • Divorce law excluding pension benefits from asset redistribution declared unconstitutional
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
ConvictionConviction
Sonneblom
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch
ConvictionConviction
Home » Lawyers for Human Rights angered as directors again defy Labour Court in long-running contempt case
Labour Law

Lawyers for Human Rights angered as directors again defy Labour Court in long-running contempt case

Another postponement delays justice for dismissed worker Vusimusi Hlope, three years after an unfair dismissal.
Conviction Staff ReporterBy Conviction Staff ReporterNovember 13, 2025Updated:November 13, 2025No Comments
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email
  • Vusimusi Hlope has remained unemployed for three years after an unfair dismissal ruling.
  • Labour Court again postponed the contempt case against Integrated Business Supply directors,
  • LHR states that continued defiance undermines the enforcement of workers’ rights and the authority of the courts.

The Labour Court has once again postponed the long-running contempt of court case brought by Lawyers for Human Rights (LHR) and the Casual Workers Advice Office against the directors of Integrated Business Supply.

This postponement deepens frustration over what advocates describe as tactics in defying justice. The case began in September 2021, when Vusimusi Hlope was dismissed after raising complaints about his wages.

In October 2022, the Metal and Engineering Industries Bargaining Council found the dismissal unfair and ordered his reinstatement. Despite the ruling, Hlope remains unemployed three years later because the company refused to comply.

Directors Evan and Michael Linley and Karien Stassen were found guilty of contempt in November 2023 and fined R150 000, suspended for 30 days on condition they reinstate Hlope. They neither reinstated him nor paid the fine, and have now defied the court for two years.

Court grants another reprieve

When LHR requested the directors’ incarceration in August 2025 to enforce compliance, the Labour Court instructed them to appear on 11 November 2025 and to submit affidavits explaining why they had not complied with the November 2023 order. The directors failed to do so.

With new legal representation, they requested more time to raise settlement funds. The court granted another postponement, giving them until 10 March 2026 to pay.

“We had hoped that Tuesday’s hearing would be the end of the matter with justice for Hlope,” said Buhle Sibiya, Legal Counsellor at LHR. “Instead, we are facing yet another delay in a matter that should have been resolved years ago.”

Justice delayed is justice denied

Sibiya emphasised the wider implications. “While we recognise the authority of the court, the continued postponement of this matter, despite the directors failing to obey previous orders, is deeply disheartening. Justice for Hlope has yet again been delayed.”

“By refusing to reinstate Hlope, the directors have dug a financial hole for themselves,” LHR added. “They now owe back pay from the date of reinstatement plus interest.”

The real cost of defiance

LHR also warned that the continued defiance raises serious concerns about the challenges in enforcing workers’ rights. “Court orders are not suggestions,” Sibiya said.

“They are the cornerstone of justice. If employers can ignore them without consequence, the rights of workers everywhere are at risk.”

Conviction.co.za 

Get your news on the go. Click here to follow the Conviction WhatsApp channel.

“Justice for Hlope has yet again been delayed. The continued postponement, despite clear court orders, is deeply disheartening.” — Buhle Sibiya, LHR

contempt of court Human Rights Labour law South Africa courts workers’ rights
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Conviction Staff Reporter

Conviction.co.za — Towards a Positive Impact on People

Related Posts

Judge Pillay’s jurisprudence in defence of the oppressed and the Nobel Peace Prize

October 11, 2026

Home Affairs withdraws asylum directive amid violent anti-migrant protests

October 9, 2026

Police captain loses eight-month pay award because promotion dispute was filed too late

October 8, 2026
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Prove your humanity: 9   +   6   =  

Subscribe to our newsletter:
Top Posts

Your driving licence at the gate: What estates can actually legally scan

Sponsor: My Estate LifeSeptember 6, 2026

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024

Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

November 27, 2024
Don't Miss
Opinion
8 Mins Read

Judge Pillay’s jurisprudence in defence of the oppressed and the Nobel Peace Prize

By Mametlwe SebeiOctober 11, 20268 Mins Read

Academic Mametlwe Sebei examines how Judge Navi Pillay’s legal career, from defending anti-apartheid activists to confronting alleged genocide in Gaza, reflects a commitment to defending the oppressed through law.

KFC’s ‘Only this Friday’ advert misled customers about meal deal availability dates

October 11, 2026

Business owner ordered to pay R200,000 for banning LGBTQ+ people from his shop

October 11, 2026

Prima Facie: When the system you serve turns and eats you without warning

October 10, 2026
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • WhatsApp
Demo
About Us
About Us

Helping South Africans to navigate the legal landscape; providing accessible legal information; and giving a voice to those seeking justice.

Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube WhatsApp Twitch RSS
Latest posts

Your driving licence at the gate: What estates can actually legally scan

Sponsor: My Estate LifeSeptember 6, 2026

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024
OUR PICKS

APRAV welcomes new RAF boss and rejects Road Accident Benefit Scheme revival plan

October 9, 2026

Rhodes deputy VC acknowledges student debt concerns; spokesperson refers arrests to SAPS

October 5, 2026

AI-polished images and ‘Satin’ badges made a polyester Shein dress look premium

October 4, 2026
© 2026 Conviction.
  • Home
  • Buy Now
  • Law & Justice

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Powered by
Necessary cookies enable essential site features like secure log-ins and consent preference adjustments. They do not store personal data.
None
Functional cookies support features like content sharing on social media, collecting feedback, and enabling third-party tools.
None
Analytical cookies track visitor interactions, providing insights on metrics like visitor count, bounce rate, and traffic sources.
None
Advertisement cookies deliver personalized ads based on your previous visits and analyze the effectiveness of ad campaigns.
None
Unclassified cookies are cookies that we are in the process of classifying, together with the providers of individual cookies.
None
Powered by