Close Menu
ConvictionConviction
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

Supplier ordered to refund R4 599 after selling defective engines to motorist

December 7, 2025

Shoppers label Soshanguve Mall’s R2 toilet fee a ‘human rights violation’

December 6, 2025

Sun tanning capsules ruling exposes online beauty scam targeting South Africans

December 6, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trending
  • Supplier ordered to refund R4 599 after selling defective engines to motorist
  • Shoppers label Soshanguve Mall’s R2 toilet fee a ‘human rights violation’
  • Sun tanning capsules ruling exposes online beauty scam targeting South Africans
  • ‘Any lawyer who says I will work for free is a danger to himself’
  • Judge condemns xenophobia at clinic gates as a threat to democracy
  • SCA orders fresh inquest into the death of Theresa Wampach-Todd
  • CCMA condemned for forcing MTN case to continue while employer rep lay in hospital
  • Consumer bought freedom from Eskom and got darkness instead
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
ConvictionConviction
Demo
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch
ConvictionConviction
Home » Lawyers for Human Rights angered as directors again defy Labour Court in long-running contempt case
Labour Law

Lawyers for Human Rights angered as directors again defy Labour Court in long-running contempt case

Another postponement delays justice for dismissed worker Vusimusi Hlope, three years after an unfair dismissal.
Conviction Staff ReporterBy Conviction Staff ReporterNovember 13, 2025Updated:November 13, 2025No Comments
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
blank
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email
  • Vusimusi Hlope has remained unemployed for three years after an unfair dismissal ruling.
  • Labour Court again postponed the contempt case against Integrated Business Supply directors,
  • LHR states that continued defiance undermines the enforcement of workers’ rights and the authority of the courts.

The Labour Court has once again postponed the long-running contempt of court case brought by Lawyers for Human Rights (LHR) and the Casual Workers Advice Office against the directors of Integrated Business Supply.

This postponement deepens frustration over what advocates describe as tactics in defying justice. The case began in September 2021, when Vusimusi Hlope was dismissed after raising complaints about his wages.

In October 2022, the Metal and Engineering Industries Bargaining Council found the dismissal unfair and ordered his reinstatement. Despite the ruling, Hlope remains unemployed three years later because the company refused to comply.

Directors Evan and Michael Linley and Karien Stassen were found guilty of contempt in November 2023 and fined R150 000, suspended for 30 days on condition they reinstate Hlope. They neither reinstated him nor paid the fine, and have now defied the court for two years.

Court grants another reprieve

When LHR requested the directors’ incarceration in August 2025 to enforce compliance, the Labour Court instructed them to appear on 11 November 2025 and to submit affidavits explaining why they had not complied with the November 2023 order. The directors failed to do so.

With new legal representation, they requested more time to raise settlement funds. The court granted another postponement, giving them until 10 March 2026 to pay.

“We had hoped that Tuesday’s hearing would be the end of the matter with justice for Hlope,” said Buhle Sibiya, Legal Counsellor at LHR. “Instead, we are facing yet another delay in a matter that should have been resolved years ago.”

Justice delayed is justice denied

Sibiya emphasised the wider implications. “While we recognise the authority of the court, the continued postponement of this matter, despite the directors failing to obey previous orders, is deeply disheartening. Justice for Hlope has yet again been delayed.”

“By refusing to reinstate Hlope, the directors have dug a financial hole for themselves,” LHR added. “They now owe back pay from the date of reinstatement plus interest.”

The real cost of defiance

LHR also warned that the continued defiance raises serious concerns about the challenges in enforcing workers’ rights. “Court orders are not suggestions,” Sibiya said.

“They are the cornerstone of justice. If employers can ignore them without consequence, the rights of workers everywhere are at risk.”

Conviction.co.za 

Get your news on the go. Clickhere to follow the Conviction WhatsApp channel.

“Justice for Hlope has yet again been delayed. The continued postponement, despite clear court orders, is deeply disheartening.” — Buhle Sibiya, LHR

contempt of court Human Rights Labour law South Africa courts workers’ rights
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Conviction Staff Reporter

    Conviction.co.za — Towards a Positive Impact on People

    Related Posts

    CCMA condemned for forcing MTN case to continue while employer rep lay in hospital

    December 5, 2025

    Court vindicates nurse, finding no proof she was linked to ARVs at son’s home

    December 3, 2025

    Labour Court orders Stallion Security to pay unpaid commission to former employee

    December 2, 2025
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Prove your humanity: 1   +   3   =  

    Subscribe to our newsletter:
    Top Posts

    Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

    January 17, 2025

    Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

    December 31, 2024

    Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

    November 27, 2024

    Irregular levy increases, mismanagement, and legal threats in a sectional title scheme

    June 2, 2025
    Don't Miss
    Consumer Protection Law
    3 Mins Read

    Supplier ordered to refund R4 599 after selling defective engines to motorist

    By Kennedy MudzuliDecember 7, 20253 Mins Read

    A South African consumer was forced to pay for multiple defective engines supplied by Motors & More. The National Consumer Tribunal has now ordered the company to refund R4,599.30, ruling its conduct as prohibited under the Consumer Protection Act.

    Shoppers label Soshanguve Mall’s R2 toilet fee a ‘human rights violation’

    December 6, 2025

    Sun tanning capsules ruling exposes online beauty scam targeting South Africans

    December 6, 2025

    ‘Any lawyer who says I will work for free is a danger to himself’

    December 5, 2025
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • WhatsApp
    Demo
    About Us
    About Us

    Helping South Africans to navigate the legal landscape; providing accessible legal information; and giving a voice to those seeking justice.

    Facebook X (Twitter) WhatsApp
    Our Picks

    Supplier ordered to refund R4 599 after selling defective engines to motorist

    December 7, 2025

    Shoppers label Soshanguve Mall’s R2 toilet fee a ‘human rights violation’

    December 6, 2025

    Sun tanning capsules ruling exposes online beauty scam targeting South Africans

    December 6, 2025
    Most Popular

    Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

    January 17, 2025

    Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

    December 31, 2024

    Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

    November 27, 2024
    © 2025 Conviction.
    • Home
    • Law & Justice
    • Special Reports
    • Opinion
    • Ask The Expert
    • Get In Touch

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.