The Gauteng High Court in Pretoria has ruled in favour of the Kosmosdal Extension 61 and Extension 62 Homeowners Association, invalidating actions taken at a contentious special general meeting held on 19 September 2024.
The court affirmed the legitimacy of the existing board following a dispute that embroiled the association’s governance. The parties involved were engaged in a dispute regarding board membership within the Homeowners Association, which represents 596 households.
During the meeting, resolutions were purportedly adopted to remove the existing directors and appoint new ones. However, the entity argued that the meeting was not properly constituted in accordance with the Memorandum of Incorporation. It contended that the removal of the existing directors, the appointment of new directors, and subsequent actions taken by the newly appointed board were invalid.
In a detailed account of the proceedings, the respondents convened the meeting without following proper protocols. The applicants argued that there had been no adequate notice given to all members, nor had the meeting been convened through the requisite demands from members holding 10% of voting rights, as required by the Memorandum of Incorporation.
During the court hearing, legal representatives debated the validity of the 19 September meeting extensively. A representative of the Kosmosdal Homeowners Association, highlighted substantial failures by the respondents to comply with the association’s governance rules. The court agreed, ruling that without necessary procedural compliance, the meeting’s actions, including the appointment of new directors, were rendered void.
Financial and legal implications
As a result of this ruling, the provisional order granted on 18 December 2024 has now been affirmed. The order prohibited misleading claims regarding the association and its board, effectively barring any external attempts to alter its composition. Additionally, any funds directed to Trafalgar Property Management (Pty) Ltd during the dispute will remain in trust until the matter is resolved. The court also dismissed the respondents' counterclaim, which sought to legitimise the directors appointed at the disputed September meeting.
#Conviction
Get your news on the go. Click here to follow the Conviction WhatsApp channel
