Skip to content
Close Menu
ConvictionConviction
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

Unisa Law Clinic launches drive for professional attire donations to support LLB students

July 26, 2026

Consumers warned against paying for misleading quick exit debt review promises

July 25, 2026

African Court urged to hold governments accountable for climate harm affecting children

July 25, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trending
  • Unisa Law Clinic launches drive for professional attire donations to support LLB students
  • Consumers warned against paying for misleading quick exit debt review promises
  • African Court urged to hold governments accountable for climate harm affecting children
  • Screenshots are not evidence: The new frontier of unfair dismissal in South Africa
  • From rock samples to rocking the stage: Gavaza Mongwe advances to Mrs SA Top 30
  • Why the High Court sided with Ramaphosa in the Phala Phala impeachment battle
  • SCOPA chair Zibi says RAF’s declining performance triggered Parliament’s inquiry
  • D-day for law firm to repay R500 000 property deposit after holding money for nearly nine years
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
ConvictionConviction
Sonneblom
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch
ConvictionConviction
Home » Homeowners granted six months to settle bond arrears and halt home sale
Property Law

Homeowners granted six months to settle bond arrears and halt home sale

A Johannesburg court has given a family one last chance to settle their bond arrears and avoid losing their home.
Kennedy MudzuliBy Kennedy MudzuliJune 9, 2026No Comments
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email
  • The High Court has suspended the sale in execution of a Johannesburg family's home for six months.
  • Nedbank had already obtained judgment and an order declaring the property specially executable.
  • The homeowners must settle all arrears by 4 November 2026 or face a new sale in execution.

A Johannesburg family facing the loss of their home has been granted a six-month reprieve after the High Court suspended the sale in execution of their property.

This decision came despite the court noting that the family had brought their application at the very last minute and even changed their case during the hearing.

The dispute involved Nedbank Limited and homeowners Sibusiso Msomi and Shady Girly Msomi. Nedbank obtained judgment against the couple on 27 February 2025 for amounts owed under a mortgage bond and secured an order declaring their property specially executable.

The property, which is the couple’s primary residence, was set to be sold in execution on 5 June 2026.

Background to the dispute

After Nedbank obtained judgment, the homeowners engaged with the bank but did not enter into a payment arrangement, settle the arrears, or seek rescission of the judgment. A first sale in execution was scheduled for July 2025.

On the eve of that auction, the homeowners presented a private offer to purchase the property for R1.25 million. The purchaser successfully bid at the auction, but the sale was later cancelled after no payment was made. Following that cancellation, a second sale in execution was arranged for 5 June 2026.

The homeowners urgently approached the court to stop this sale, initially relying on a planned rescission application. However, during the hearing, their legal team abandoned that argument and instead asked for time to pay the arrears and save their home.

Relying on recent payments made into the bond account, the homeowners argued that they could settle the outstanding arrears within six months if execution was suspended.

Judge criticises last-minute change of case

Judge S Wentzel-Thompson was critical of how the matter was presented. The court noted that the homeowners’ legal representative had abandoned the original basis for the application and advanced an entirely new argument that had not been set out in their papers.

Judge Wentzel-Thompson remarked, “The applicant was undeniably ambushed and opposed my granting any indulgence to the respondents at this late stage to settle their long-outstanding indebtedness and avoid the imminent sale of their property in execution of that debt.”

The court also recorded that the homeowners only launched the urgent application days before the scheduled auction, despite having earlier opportunities to resolve the situation.

Court finds justice favoured temporary relief

Despite these concerns, the court considered whether a stay of execution would serve the interests of justice. The homeowners had paid R200,000 into the bond account in March 2026 and resumed monthly instalments in May and June 2026.

Although Nedbank argued that these payments were still insufficient and substantial arrears remained outstanding, the court decided a final opportunity should be given.

Judge Wentzel-Thompson emphasised that Rule 45A gives courts discretion to suspend execution when justice requires it. Referring to previous decisions, the judge noted, “The guiding principle will be that execution will be suspended where real and substantial justice necessitates it.”

He continued, “I have decided in the exercise of my discretion to afford the respondents a final lifeline to stay execution of the judgment provided that they pay all of their arrears within a period of six months… I do so as I fundamentally feel that this would be in the interests of justice.”

The court also found it significant that the homeowners had demonstrated good faith by making substantial payments towards the arrears and maintaining recent instalments.

Final warning from the court

While granting relief, the court made it clear that the homeowners had reached the end of the road for judicial indulgences.

Judge Wentzel Thompson warned, “Should the full amount of the arrears not be settled within six months, the applicant is entitled to forthwith proceed with a sale in execution and no further indulgences will be granted.”

The sale in execution has been suspended until 4 November 2026. Nedbank is entitled to immediately arrange a new sale in execution for 5 November 2026 if the arrears are not settled in full by that date.

The homeowners were also ordered to pay the costs of the application and the wasted costs related to the cancelled sale in execution scheduled for 5 June 2026.

Conviction.co.za

Get your news on the go. Click here to follow the Conviction WhatsApp channel.

Gauteng High Court mortgage arrears Nedbank Property law sale in execution
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Kennedy Mudzuli

Multiple award-winner with passion for news and training young journalists. Founder and editor of Conviction.co.za

Related Posts

D-day for law firm to repay R500 000 property deposit after holding money for nearly nine years

July 24, 2026

Municipal effort to charge student housing commercial rates ruled unlawful

July 23, 2026

Two common mistakes can sink CSOS disputes before hearings begin

July 23, 2026
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Prove your humanity: 4   +   4   =  

Subscribe to our newsletter:
Top Posts

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024

Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

November 27, 2024

Irregular levy increases, mismanagement, and legal threats in a sectional title scheme

June 2, 2025
Don't Miss
Special Reports
3 Mins Read

Unisa Law Clinic launches drive for professional attire donations to support LLB students

By Conviction Staff ReporterJuly 26, 20263 Mins Read

The Unisa Law Clinic is inviting donations of quality pre-loved business attire to help LLB students prepare for interviews, court observations and practical legal training.

Consumers warned against paying for misleading quick exit debt review promises

July 25, 2026

African Court urged to hold governments accountable for climate harm affecting children

July 25, 2026

Screenshots are not evidence: The new frontier of unfair dismissal in South Africa

July 24, 2026
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • WhatsApp
Demo
About Us
About Us

Helping South Africans to navigate the legal landscape; providing accessible legal information; and giving a voice to those seeking justice.

Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube WhatsApp Twitch RSS
Latest posts

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024

Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

November 27, 2024
OUR PICKS

Judge dismisses bid to suspend attorneys over R23 million dispute, citing unfair investigation

July 22, 2026

Wedding rehearsal or workplace protest? Judge rules in favour of singing mineworkers

July 21, 2026

Labour Court stops municipal disciplinary hearing over AI citation concerns

July 22, 2026
© 2026 Conviction.
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Powered by
►
Necessary cookies enable essential site features like secure log-ins and consent preference adjustments. They do not store personal data.
None
►
Functional cookies support features like content sharing on social media, collecting feedback, and enabling third-party tools.
None
►
Analytical cookies track visitor interactions, providing insights on metrics like visitor count, bounce rate, and traffic sources.
None
►
Advertisement cookies deliver personalized ads based on your previous visits and analyze the effectiveness of ad campaigns.
None
►
Unclassified cookies are cookies that we are in the process of classifying, together with the providers of individual cookies.
None
Powered by