Skip to content
Close Menu
ConvictionConviction
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

Screenshots are not evidence: The new frontier of unfair dismissal in South Africa

July 24, 2026

Why the High Court sided with Ramaphosa in the Phala Phala impeachment battle

July 24, 2026

SCOPA chair Zibi says RAF’s declining performance triggered Parliament’s inquiry

July 24, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trending
  • Screenshots are not evidence: The new frontier of unfair dismissal in South Africa
  • Why the High Court sided with Ramaphosa in the Phala Phala impeachment battle
  • SCOPA chair Zibi says RAF’s declining performance triggered Parliament’s inquiry
  • D-day for law firm to repay R500 000 property deposit after holding money for nearly nine years
  • Dealer cannot dictate repairs for defective vehicles; BMW buyer wins full refund
  • Hospital cannot hide behind ‘error of judgment’ defence after teacher suffered brain damage
  • How March and March turned a deadline into a death sentence for migrants in South Africa
  • Municipal effort to charge student housing commercial rates ruled unlawful
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
ConvictionConviction
Sonneblom
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch
ConvictionConviction
Home » Water rights without implementation are failing Africa’s most vulnerable millions
Opinion

Water rights without implementation are failing Africa’s most vulnerable millions

Postdoctoral fellow Olayinka Adeniyi and Prof Ebenezer Durojaye examine how legal recognition of water rights continues to fail in practice.
Olayinka Adeniyi and Prof Ebenezer DurojayeBy Olayinka Adeniyi and Prof Ebenezer DurojayeApril 7, 2026No Comments
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
Millions across Africa continue to struggle for access to safe drinking water despite legal recognition of water as a fundamental human right.
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email
  • Africa’s water crisis persists despite strong legal recognition of the right to water.
  • Failures in infrastructure, governance and accountability continue to deny communities safe access.
  • Effective implementation, not new promises, is required to realise water justice.

The availability of safe drinking water is key to understanding Africa’s water crisis. The WHO and UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme found that just 39% of Africans used safely managed drinking water in 2020, highlighting a significant disparity between Africa and better-served regions.

The issue goes beyond rainfall and physical deprivation. Weak infrastructure, poor service delivery, governance failures and entrenched inequality determine who receives water, when and at what cost.

This situation must be framed within human rights law. Water is a legal right under international law. According to the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights General Comment No 15, everyone has the right to sufficient, safe, acceptable, physically accessible and affordable water for personal and domestic use.

In Resolution 64/292, the United Nations General Assembly recognised safe and clean drinking water and sanitation as a human right that is essential to the full enjoyment of life and all human rights.

Africa’s water crisis as a justice issue

Regional norms and interpretation support the right to water in Africa. While the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights does not explicitly state a right to water, the African Commission’s Guidelines on the Right to Water in Africa link it to life, dignity, health, development and a satisfactory environment.

The African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the Child, as well as the Maputo Protocol, explicitly protect children and women from unsafe drinking water. This makes Africa’s water dilemma a crisis of water justice. It is not just a question of whether water exists, but whether safe water is accessible to all.

The unsettling reality is that the right to water is recognised more often in law than in everyday life. The consequences are not abstract; they are reflected in the lived experiences of many, including the cholera outbreak in Hammanskraal in 2023.

According to the government, the outbreak was attributed to polluted water sources and prolonged failures at the Rooiwal wastewater works upstream, while investigations by the Water Research Commission focused on treatment and sanitation failures in the region. Access to safe water became a matter of life and death.

A pattern of systemic failure

Hammanskraal is not an isolated case. For years, residents of Makhanda have faced recurring water shortages, sewage leaks and deteriorating municipal systems. Johannesburg is currently experiencing similar challenges. The pattern is consistent across many regions of Africa. Rights are recognised, but infrastructure is not properly maintained, accountability is weak, and communities bear the consequences of state failure.

The issue is not confined to South Africa. A human rights assessment conducted in Kenya’s informal settlements, endorsed by the United Nations, revealed persistent inequality in access to safe and affordable water, particularly in Nairobi and other urban areas. For many residents, especially in rural communities and predominantly women, water is accessible only through unsafe, unreliable or costly means. This is not merely a service delivery failure. It is a failure of justice.

Some may argue that these are primarily technical challenges arising from urbanisation, climate change, drought or ageing infrastructure. These factors are real and important, but they do not fully explain the crisis.

The core questions remain who is protected, who is neglected and whose suffering is normalised. Poor communities are expected to rely on emergency measures while others enjoy uninterrupted supply. Water injustice persists where governance is weak, maintenance is delayed, and budgets are mismanaged. It persists where wastewater contamination is tolerated, tanker systems become permanent substitutes for proper infrastructure and communities are excluded from decisions that affect their lives.

Pathways to meaningful implementation

There are, however, real opportunities to improve access to water across the continent. Africa has strong legal and normative frameworks, including in countries such as South Africa, where constitutional, statutory and policy commitments can be used to demand accountability and improved performance. Recent crises have also made it impossible to treat water as a secondary issue.

Access to safe water affects health, education, dignity, food systems, livelihoods and public trust in government. There is also growing recognition that decentralised, community-responsive and well-monitored water systems can be more effective for underserved communities than centralised systems that fail to materialise. The challenge is not only the establishment of systems, but their maintenance, integrity in governance and accountability to the people they are meant to serve.

From recognition to accountability

What actions should be taken? Governments must treat failures in water provision as violations of human rights rather than minor administrative shortcomings. This requires sustained investment in maintenance, wastewater treatment, water quality monitoring and transparent budgeting, alongside the development of new infrastructure.

It also requires the publication of clear and accessible service delivery data. Communities must be meaningfully involved in planning and oversight processes. Where local government fails, intervention must be decisive and effective, not a continuous cycle of explanations without results.

Responsibility also extends to the private sector. Businesses that pollute water sources, benefit from exclusionary water arrangements or undermine community access must comply with human rights standards. Regional institutions, civil society, researchers and the media all have a role to play in holding states accountable and pushing for a shift from symbolic commitments to tangible outcomes.

Water is not merely a technical resource, a development objective or a service delivery issue. It is a fundamental human right with direct implications for dignity, equality, health and democratic accountability. Africa does not need further recognition of the right to water.

What is required is implementation grounded in substantive equality, with deliberate attention to those who have been historically disadvantaged and continue to wait the longest for access.

Conviction.co.za

Get your news on the go. Click here to follow the Conviction WhatsApp channel.

Africa water crisis human rights law infrastructure failure Service delivery water rights
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Olayinka Adeniyi and Prof Ebenezer Durojaye

Postdoctoral fellow Adeniyi and Prof Ebenezer Durojaye of the Centre for Human Rights, University of Pretoria.

Related Posts

How March and March turned a deadline into a death sentence for migrants in South Africa

July 23, 2026

Augmenting apartheid memory through art, exhibition and lived experience

July 22, 2026

South Africa must weigh the economic cost of forcing undocumented immigrants to leave

July 21, 2026
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Prove your humanity: 7   +   1   =  

Subscribe to our newsletter:
Top Posts

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024

Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

November 27, 2024

Irregular levy increases, mismanagement, and legal threats in a sectional title scheme

June 2, 2025
Don't Miss
Employment and Labour Law Series
5 Mins Read

Screenshots are not evidence: The new frontier of unfair dismissal in South Africa

By Ann-Suhet MarxJuly 24, 20265 Mins Read

A recent Labour Court judgment has reshaped how digital evidence should be treated in workplace disputes. Ann Suhet Marx argues that screenshots, without proof of authenticity, authorship and context, cannot fairly justify dismissing an employee.

Why the High Court sided with Ramaphosa in the Phala Phala impeachment battle

July 24, 2026

SCOPA chair Zibi says RAF’s declining performance triggered Parliament’s inquiry

July 24, 2026

D-day for law firm to repay R500 000 property deposit after holding money for nearly nine years

July 24, 2026
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • WhatsApp
Demo
About Us
About Us

Helping South Africans to navigate the legal landscape; providing accessible legal information; and giving a voice to those seeking justice.

Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube WhatsApp Twitch RSS
Latest posts

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024

Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

November 27, 2024
OUR PICKS

Judge dismisses bid to suspend attorneys over R23 million dispute, citing unfair investigation

July 22, 2026

Wedding rehearsal or workplace protest? Judge rules in favour of singing mineworkers

July 21, 2026

Mpumalanga records highest initiation death toll, prompting CRL Rights Commission inquiry

July 21, 2026
© 2026 Conviction.
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Powered by
►
Necessary cookies enable essential site features like secure log-ins and consent preference adjustments. They do not store personal data.
None
►
Functional cookies support features like content sharing on social media, collecting feedback, and enabling third-party tools.
None
►
Analytical cookies track visitor interactions, providing insights on metrics like visitor count, bounce rate, and traffic sources.
None
►
Advertisement cookies deliver personalized ads based on your previous visits and analyze the effectiveness of ad campaigns.
None
►
Unclassified cookies are cookies that we are in the process of classifying, together with the providers of individual cookies.
None
Powered by