Skip to content
Close Menu
ConvictionConviction
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

Case comes before court without heads of argument and is removed from the roll

April 13, 2026

Free State farmers win legal battle to pursue fire damage claims against Eskom

April 13, 2026

Pinelands High School’s slavery simulation violated learners’ constitutional rights

April 12, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trending
  • Case comes before court without heads of argument and is removed from the roll
  • Free State farmers win legal battle to pursue fire damage claims against Eskom
  • Pinelands High School’s slavery simulation violated learners’ constitutional rights
  • Forged documents and misconduct cases: Why you should verify your lawyer
  • Unisa Law Clinic outreach advances access to justice in Mamelodi community
  • No Will? Big trouble for South African spouses as estate disputes escalate
  • Judges Matter welcomes historic appointment of two more women to the Constitutional Court
  • Police recover stolen livestock and arrest suspect in OR Tambo District
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
ConvictionConviction
Demo
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch
ConvictionConviction
Home » Water rights without implementation are failing Africa’s most vulnerable millions
Opinion

Water rights without implementation are failing Africa’s most vulnerable millions

Postdoctoral fellow Olayinka Adeniyi and Prof Ebenezer Durojaye examine how legal recognition of water rights continues to fail in practice.
Olayinka Adeniyi and Prof Ebenezer DurojayeBy Olayinka Adeniyi and Prof Ebenezer DurojayeApril 7, 2026No Comments
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
blank
Millions across Africa continue to struggle for access to safe drinking water despite legal recognition of water as a fundamental human right.
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email
  • Africa’s water crisis persists despite strong legal recognition of the right to water.
  • Failures in infrastructure, governance and accountability continue to deny communities safe access.
  • Effective implementation, not new promises, is required to realise water justice.

The availability of safe drinking water is key to understanding Africa’s water crisis. The WHO and UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme found that just 39% of Africans used safely managed drinking water in 2020, highlighting a significant disparity between Africa and better-served regions.

The issue goes beyond rainfall and physical deprivation. Weak infrastructure, poor service delivery, governance failures and entrenched inequality determine who receives water, when and at what cost.

This situation must be framed within human rights law. Water is a legal right under international law. According to the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights General Comment No 15, everyone has the right to sufficient, safe, acceptable, physically accessible and affordable water for personal and domestic use.

In Resolution 64/292, the United Nations General Assembly recognised safe and clean drinking water and sanitation as a human right that is essential to the full enjoyment of life and all human rights.

Africa’s water crisis as a justice issue

Regional norms and interpretation support the right to water in Africa. While the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights does not explicitly state a right to water, the African Commission’s Guidelines on the Right to Water in Africa link it to life, dignity, health, development and a satisfactory environment.

The African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the Child, as well as the Maputo Protocol, explicitly protect children and women from unsafe drinking water. This makes Africa’s water dilemma a crisis of water justice. It is not just a question of whether water exists, but whether safe water is accessible to all.

The unsettling reality is that the right to water is recognised more often in law than in everyday life. The consequences are not abstract; they are reflected in the lived experiences of many, including the cholera outbreak in Hammanskraal in 2023.

According to the government, the outbreak was attributed to polluted water sources and prolonged failures at the Rooiwal wastewater works upstream, while investigations by the Water Research Commission focused on treatment and sanitation failures in the region. Access to safe water became a matter of life and death.

A pattern of systemic failure

Hammanskraal is not an isolated case. For years, residents of Makhanda have faced recurring water shortages, sewage leaks and deteriorating municipal systems. Johannesburg is currently experiencing similar challenges. The pattern is consistent across many regions of Africa. Rights are recognised, but infrastructure is not properly maintained, accountability is weak, and communities bear the consequences of state failure.

The issue is not confined to South Africa. A human rights assessment conducted in Kenya’s informal settlements, endorsed by the United Nations, revealed persistent inequality in access to safe and affordable water, particularly in Nairobi and other urban areas. For many residents, especially in rural communities and predominantly women, water is accessible only through unsafe, unreliable or costly means. This is not merely a service delivery failure. It is a failure of justice.

Some may argue that these are primarily technical challenges arising from urbanisation, climate change, drought or ageing infrastructure. These factors are real and important, but they do not fully explain the crisis.

The core questions remain who is protected, who is neglected and whose suffering is normalised. Poor communities are expected to rely on emergency measures while others enjoy uninterrupted supply. Water injustice persists where governance is weak, maintenance is delayed, and budgets are mismanaged. It persists where wastewater contamination is tolerated, tanker systems become permanent substitutes for proper infrastructure and communities are excluded from decisions that affect their lives.

Pathways to meaningful implementation

There are, however, real opportunities to improve access to water across the continent. Africa has strong legal and normative frameworks, including in countries such as South Africa, where constitutional, statutory and policy commitments can be used to demand accountability and improved performance. Recent crises have also made it impossible to treat water as a secondary issue.

Access to safe water affects health, education, dignity, food systems, livelihoods and public trust in government. There is also growing recognition that decentralised, community-responsive and well-monitored water systems can be more effective for underserved communities than centralised systems that fail to materialise. The challenge is not only the establishment of systems, but their maintenance, integrity in governance and accountability to the people they are meant to serve.

From recognition to accountability

What actions should be taken? Governments must treat failures in water provision as violations of human rights rather than minor administrative shortcomings. This requires sustained investment in maintenance, wastewater treatment, water quality monitoring and transparent budgeting, alongside the development of new infrastructure.

It also requires the publication of clear and accessible service delivery data. Communities must be meaningfully involved in planning and oversight processes. Where local government fails, intervention must be decisive and effective, not a continuous cycle of explanations without results.

Responsibility also extends to the private sector. Businesses that pollute water sources, benefit from exclusionary water arrangements or undermine community access must comply with human rights standards. Regional institutions, civil society, researchers and the media all have a role to play in holding states accountable and pushing for a shift from symbolic commitments to tangible outcomes.

Water is not merely a technical resource, a development objective or a service delivery issue. It is a fundamental human right with direct implications for dignity, equality, health and democratic accountability. Africa does not need further recognition of the right to water.

What is required is implementation grounded in substantive equality, with deliberate attention to those who have been historically disadvantaged and continue to wait the longest for access.

Conviction.co.za

Get your news on the go. Clickhere to follow the Conviction WhatsApp channel.

Africa water crisis human rights law infrastructure failure Service delivery water rights
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Olayinka Adeniyi and Prof Ebenezer Durojaye

    Postdoctoral fellow Adeniyi and Prof Ebenezer Durojaye of the Centre for Human Rights, University of Pretoria.

    Related Posts

    South Africa’s Green Drop Report diagnoses a failing wastewater system

    April 9, 2026

    Attorneys must tell clients the truth to avoid costly civil litigation mistakes

    April 8, 2026

    A barber chair conversation reveals how the public misunderstands the role of a lawyer

    April 6, 2026
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Prove your humanity: 0   +   7   =  

    Subscribe to our newsletter:
    Top Posts

    Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

    January 17, 2025

    Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

    December 31, 2024

    Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

    November 27, 2024

    Irregular levy increases, mismanagement, and legal threats in a sectional title scheme

    June 2, 2025
    Don't Miss
    Legal Aid
    4 Mins Read

    Case comes before court without heads of argument and is removed from the roll

    By Kennedy MudzuliApril 13, 20264 Mins Read

    The Northern Cape High Court removed the Oreways Mining application from the roll after finding the matter was not ripe for hearing, as both parties failed to properly file heads of argument in line with court directives.

    Free State farmers win legal battle to pursue fire damage claims against Eskom

    April 13, 2026

    Pinelands High School’s slavery simulation violated learners’ constitutional rights

    April 12, 2026

    Forged documents and misconduct cases: Why you should verify your lawyer

    April 11, 2026
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • WhatsApp
    Demo
    About Us
    About Us

    Helping South Africans to navigate the legal landscape; providing accessible legal information; and giving a voice to those seeking justice.

    Facebook X (Twitter) WhatsApp
    Our Picks

    Case comes before court without heads of argument and is removed from the roll

    April 13, 2026

    Free State farmers win legal battle to pursue fire damage claims against Eskom

    April 13, 2026

    Pinelands High School’s slavery simulation violated learners’ constitutional rights

    April 12, 2026
    Most Popular

    Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

    January 17, 2025

    Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

    December 31, 2024

    Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

    November 27, 2024
    © 2026 Conviction.
    • Home
    • Law & Justice
    • Special Reports
    • Opinion
    • Ask The Expert
    • Get In Touch

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.