Skip to content
Close Menu
ConvictionConviction
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

Unfair dismissal in South Africa: What the law says, and where things go wrong

June 5, 2026

High Court rules Bitcoin is both money and capital under SA’s exchange control laws

June 5, 2026

Authorities fail to overturn ruling linked to cyclist’s fall into hidden 6.2-metre culvert

June 5, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trending
  • Unfair dismissal in South Africa: What the law says, and where things go wrong
  • High Court rules Bitcoin is both money and capital under SA’s exchange control laws
  • Authorities fail to overturn ruling linked to cyclist’s fall into hidden 6.2-metre culvert
  • Municipality cannot reopen a case settled by a binding plea and sanction agreement
  • FSCA imposes R5.39 million in penalties on financial services firms
  • Wits student wins leave to appeal refusal to renew 2026 registration
  • Africa Day celebrations and the enduring gendered contradictions of African unity
  • Businesses urged to make only provable advertising claims
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
ConvictionConviction
Sonneblom
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch
ConvictionConviction
Home » Wild Coast Sun misled guests over water park access, regulator rules
Regulatory Law

Wild Coast Sun misled guests over water park access, regulator rules

Advertising regulator finds Sun International misled consumers after conflicting information created a false expectation of access.
Kennedy MudzuliBy Kennedy MudzuliApril 21, 2026No Comments
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
Wild Coast Sun’s Wild Waves Water Park at the centre of a ruling that found its advertised daily access claim misled consumers.
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email
  • The advertisement stated the water park was open Monday to Sunday, creating a clear expectation of daily access.
  • A family booked based on that claim but found the park closed on Monday and Tuesday.
  • The Advertising Regulatory Board ruled the claim misleading and ordered it to be withdrawn.

A family arrived at the Wild Coast Sun Resort expecting to spend their Monday at the Wild Waves Water Park. However, the gates were shut.

The park closes every Monday and Tuesday, a fact buried in the fine print of a website that elsewhere told them it was open seven days a week. South Africa’s advertising regulator has now ruled that Sun International misled consumers and ordered the claim to be pulled.

The complaint was lodged after a consumer booked accommodation at the Wild Coast Sun Resort, operated by Sun International, expecting to use the Wild Waves Water Park during a stay that ran from Sunday to Tuesday. The expectation arose from advertising material viewed on or about 25 March 2026.

Parties and background

The complainant relied on a screenshot of the resort’s advertising, which stated, “The Wild Waves Water Park will be open from Monday Sunday 09h00 17h00.” The same material only referenced a limited closure, stating, “Please note the WaterPark will be closed on the 19 and 20 of January 2026.”

The Directorate noted that the January closure notice was irrelevant to the complainant’s March booking period.

Upon arrival, the complainant discovered that the water park is, in fact, closed every Monday and Tuesday as part of its standard operating schedule. The complainant submitted that this information was not prominently disclosed during the booking process and resulted in unnecessary expense and disappointment.

Advertiser’s response and supporting material

Sun International confirmed that the water park operates on a set schedule and is closed on Mondays and Tuesdays. It argued that this information is available on its website and can be accessed via additional sections such as “Learn More.”

The advertiser submitted multiple documents in support of its position, including screenshots of its website, the water park operating schedule, correspondence with the complainant, and the booking confirmation.

In its internal material, the advertiser relied on what it referred to as Annexure A, which stated, “Important Information. The Wild Waves Water Park will be open Wednesday Friday 10h00 16h00 and Saturday Sunday 09h00 17h00.”

However, the Directorate noted that the advertiser did not explain where on the website this information appeared or how prominently it was displayed to consumers.

Conflicting information across the website

The Directorate identified multiple inconsistencies across the advertiser’s own platforms.

The complainant’s material, which the Directorate noted appears identical to the advertiser’s Annexure B, stated, “The Wild Waves Water Park will be open from Monday Sunday 09h00 17h00.”

Elsewhere on the website, an “Important Information” notice relating to Easter stated, “The Wild Waves Water Park will be open during our Special Easter Operating Hours 28 March to 7 April 2026, Monday Sunday 09h00 17h00.”

The same notice added, “The Wild Waves Water Park may be closed or close early due to private functions on an ad hoc basis.” The Directorate found that this wording did not communicate routine weekly closures.

The Directorate also examined the FAQ section of the website, which stated, “Closed on Mondays to Thursdays from the 18th Jan 2021 and only open on Friday Sunday at 10h00 16h00.” This information related to a different period and did not clearly inform consumers of the current operating schedule.

In addition, the Directorate considered an “Operating Hours” tile appearing at the bottom of the website, which said, “Wednesday Friday 10h00 16h00, Saturday Sunday 09h00 17h00, Closed Monday and Tuesday.” It was not clear whether this information was available at the time the complainant made the booking or whether it was added later.

Booking confirmation reinforces expectation

The Directorate placed weight on the booking confirmation sent to the complainant, which stated, “Hotel guests enjoy complimentary access to the Wild Waves Water Park at the Wild Coast Sun.”

The confirmation described the park as a key attraction but did not indicate that it would be closed on specific days during the complainant’s stay.

Application of the Code

The Advertising Regulatory Board considered Clause 4.2.1 of Section II of the Code of Advertising Practice, which provides, “Advertisements should not contain any statement or visual presentation which, directly or by implication, omission, ambiguity, inaccuracy, exaggerated claim or otherwise, is likely to mislead the consumer.”

It also considered Clause 16 of Section III, which deals with the availability of advertised products. The Directorate clarified that the case did not concern a non-existent product. It stated that the water park clearly exists, but that the issue was whether the advertising created an expectation of availability that did not reflect reality.

The Directorate’s findings

The Directorate accepted that information about closures would be material to consumers and held, “The Complainant’s expectation to have prominent notices to this effect appears reasonable.”

It found that the advertisement relied on by the complainant created a clear and misleading expectation, stating, “Given that the advertisement provided by the Complainant expressly states that the park will be open from Monday Sunday 09h00 17h00, the Directorate agrees that the advertisement created a misleading expectation.”

The Directorate further found that other information on the website did not resolve the issue, but instead created confusion. It stated, “At best, the Operating Hours notice contradicts this expectation, and in doing so creates ambiguity.”

Outcome and sanction

The Directorate concluded, “The Directorate therefore finds that the advertisement as provided by the Complainant was misleading and in breach of Clause 4.2.1 of Section II of the Code.”

It directed, “The Advertiser is therefore requested to withdraw or appropriately amend the advertisement that gave rise to this dispute.”

The advertiser must remove any suggestion that the water park is open Monday to Sunday unless this is accurate.

Members of the Advertising Regulatory Board have also been instructed not to accept advertising that creates the impression that the park would be open on a Monday or Tuesday.

Conviction.co.za

Get your news on the go. Click here to follow the Conviction WhatsApp channel.

Advertising Regulatory Board Consumer complaint Misleading Advertising Sun International Wild Coast Sun
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Kennedy Mudzuli

Multiple award-winner with passion for news and training young journalists. Founder and editor of Conviction.co.za

Related Posts

FSCA imposes R5.39 million in penalties on financial services firms

June 5, 2026

Businesses urged to make only provable advertising claims

June 4, 2026

Matric results publication stays public after High Court dismisses appeal by Information Regulator

June 4, 2026
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Prove your humanity: 4   +   4   =  

Subscribe to our newsletter:
Top Posts

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024

Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

November 27, 2024

Irregular levy increases, mismanagement, and legal threats in a sectional title scheme

June 2, 2025
Don't Miss
Employment and Labour Law Series
7 Mins Read

Unfair dismissal in South Africa: What the law says, and where things go wrong

By Ann-Suhet MarxJune 5, 20267 Mins Read

Unfair dismissal is one of the most common workplace disputes in South Africa. Understanding the rules can help both employees and employers avoid costly mistakes.

High Court rules Bitcoin is both money and capital under SA’s exchange control laws

June 5, 2026

Authorities fail to overturn ruling linked to cyclist’s fall into hidden 6.2-metre culvert

June 5, 2026

Municipality cannot reopen a case settled by a binding plea and sanction agreement

June 5, 2026
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • WhatsApp
Demo
About Us
About Us

Helping South Africans to navigate the legal landscape; providing accessible legal information; and giving a voice to those seeking justice.

Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube WhatsApp Twitch RSS
Latest posts

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024

Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

November 27, 2024
OUR PICKS

Agricultural advisors declared scientists in landmark Labour Court ruling

February 17, 2026

R13,914 debt triggers sale of R380 000 home, transfer halted amid execution flaws

April 20, 2026

Understanding employee rights, workplace protections and grievance resolution in South Africa

June 8, 2025
© 2026 Conviction.
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Powered by
►
Necessary cookies enable essential site features like secure log-ins and consent preference adjustments. They do not store personal data.
None
►
Functional cookies support features like content sharing on social media, collecting feedback, and enabling third-party tools.
None
►
Analytical cookies track visitor interactions, providing insights on metrics like visitor count, bounce rate, and traffic sources.
None
►
Advertisement cookies deliver personalized ads based on your previous visits and analyze the effectiveness of ad campaigns.
None
►
Unclassified cookies are cookies that we are in the process of classifying, together with the providers of individual cookies.
None
Powered by