Skip to content
Close Menu
ConvictionConviction
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

South Africa’s migration tensions reveal deeper economic and governance failures

June 18, 2026

Huawei Care misled consumers by promising theft cover but excluding thefts that did not involve force

June 18, 2026

Home Affairs says there is no deadline for foreign nationals to leave South Africa

June 18, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trending
  • South Africa’s migration tensions reveal deeper economic and governance failures
  • Huawei Care misled consumers by promising theft cover but excluding thefts that did not involve force
  • Home Affairs says there is no deadline for foreign nationals to leave South Africa
  • New acting judges’ rules introduce a 12-year legal experience requirement from 1 July 2026
  • Law firm wins battle for records on how CCMA allocated legal work
  • Attorney who blames secretary is like surgeon blaming nurse, judge says
  • Gcina Dhladhla’s passing at work: The case of a continuing toxic workplace regime
  • Foreign nationals leave SA amid growing tension ahead of planned 30 June deadline
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
ConvictionConviction
Sonneblom
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch
ConvictionConviction
Home » SAHRC finds racial discrimination at Hartbeespoort
Human Rights

SAHRC finds racial discrimination at Hartbeespoort

The Commission ruled the Department of Water and Sanitation violated the rights of black applicants.
Kennedy MudzuliBy Kennedy MudzuliNovember 27, 2025Updated:November 27, 2025No Comments
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
A report by the South African Human Rights Commission has exposed racial discrimination in Hartbeespoort, ruling that black applicants were denied equality and dignity in access to state‑owned shoreline land.
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email
  • Black applicants were systematically excluded from shoreline leases despite making most of the applications.
  • The Department of Water and Sanitation found to have breached rights to equality and dignity through unfair lease practices.
  • Madibeng Municipality criticised for poor management, failure to enforce by-laws and inaction on land use.

The South African Human Rights Commission has delivered its final investigative report into allegations of racial discrimination in Hartbeespoort, confirming that black applicants were systematically excluded from leasing state-owned land along the dam shoreline.

The complaint came from the Hartbeespoort Community Development Initiative, which represents black residents. They argued that their applications to lease land were ignored, while white occupants continued to benefit. The Commission found that, until recently, the majority of lease applications came from black applicants, yet only one was approved, compared to two approvals for white applicants and one for a mixed-race entity.

According to the report, the Department of Water and Sanitation violated constitutional rights by prioritising existing, mostly white occupants, and revoking Permissions to Occupy without fair processes. The Commission stated that, by revoking Permissions to Occupy without due process, the Department of Water and Sanitation violated the applicants’ rights to equality, dignity, and fair administrative action.

Failures of Madibeng

Women, especially black women, were found to be disproportionately left out of the dam economy. The Commission underlined that this exclusion represents indirect racial and gender discrimination, contradicting the Department’s duty to promote change.

The investigation also uncovered poor management by Madibeng Local Municipality. “The Commission observed that Madibeng failed to process planning and licensing applications, finalise and enforce by-laws, and fulfil commitments to conduct land audits,” the report reads. “These shortcomings, while not racially motivated, worsened tensions, hindered legitimate businesses, and undermined progress in Hartbeespoort.”

Black residents told the Commission that white occupants were allowed to develop properties without the required permissions, while black businesses faced harassment and unfair scrutiny. One resident described this as the misuse of noise complaints against black establishments, while white venues that caused noise were ignored.

Racial tensions and violence

The investigation took place amid rising racial tensions in the town. The burning of Bubbles, a black-owned recreational venue, deepened the divisions. The owner, Thabiso Mathibedi, claimed that unnamed white residents were responsible. Although the Commission could not support the arson claims, due to a lack of evidence, it noted that the incident increased mistrust and hostility.

Stakeholder discussions revealed deep rifts. Black residents talked about historical racial bias in land allocation and racially motivated physical attacks. White residents denied systemic racism, attributing the tensions to management failures, and feeling frustrated at being labelled as racist.

Police allegations

The Commission also looked into claims that the South African Police Service was involved in racial bias. While black residents asserted that SAPS did not investigate complaints against white residents, the Commission found that allegations of systemic racism against SAPS were unproven. SAPS provided evidence of ongoing investigations and prosecutions, including the conviction of a white resident for pointing a firearm at a black neighbour.

Commission directives

In its directives, the Commission ordered the Department of Water and Sanitation to finalise its updated lease policy and transformation plan, process pending applications, review previously cancelled Permissions to Occupy, and conduct a full audit to regularise occupancy.

Madibeng Municipality was told to clear its backlog of planning and business licence applications, finalise and publish outstanding by-laws, develop a transformation plan for Hartbeespoort, and ensure fair enforcement of regulations.

The Commission warned that failure to comply could lead to legal action. It concluded that these measures are essential to tackle deep-rooted exclusion, promote true equality, and restore trust in public institutions.

Conviction.co.za

Get your news on the go. Click here to follow the Conviction WhatsApp channel.

Department of Water and Sanitation Hartbeespoort Madibeng Municipality racial discrimination SAHRC
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Kennedy Mudzuli

Multiple award-winner with passion for news and training young journalists. Founder and editor of Conviction.co.za

Related Posts

Home Affairs says there is no deadline for foreign nationals to leave South Africa

June 18, 2026

Foreign nationals leave SA amid growing tension ahead of planned 30 June deadline

June 17, 2026

Ekurhuleni faces looming deadline to rebuild homes at N12 settlement

June 15, 2026
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Prove your humanity: 8   +   3   =  

Subscribe to our newsletter:
Top Posts

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024

Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

November 27, 2024

Irregular levy increases, mismanagement, and legal threats in a sectional title scheme

June 2, 2025
Don't Miss
Opinion
6 Mins Read

South Africa’s migration tensions reveal deeper economic and governance failures

By Tendai MbanjeJune 18, 20266 Mins Read

South Africa’s migration tensions reflect deeper economic and governance challenges that require dialogue, reform and regional cooperation across Africa.

Huawei Care misled consumers by promising theft cover but excluding thefts that did not involve force

June 18, 2026

Home Affairs says there is no deadline for foreign nationals to leave South Africa

June 18, 2026

New acting judges’ rules introduce a 12-year legal experience requirement from 1 July 2026

June 18, 2026
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • WhatsApp
Demo
About Us
About Us

Helping South Africans to navigate the legal landscape; providing accessible legal information; and giving a voice to those seeking justice.

Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube WhatsApp Twitch RSS
Latest posts

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024

Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

November 27, 2024
OUR PICKS

Foreign nationals leave SA amid growing tension ahead of planned 30 June deadline

June 17, 2026

Attorney who blames secretary is like surgeon blaming nurse, judge says

June 18, 2026

Legal Aid South Africa ensures continued access to legal services despite ongoing strike action

June 17, 2026
© 2026 Conviction.
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Powered by
►
Necessary cookies enable essential site features like secure log-ins and consent preference adjustments. They do not store personal data.
None
►
Functional cookies support features like content sharing on social media, collecting feedback, and enabling third-party tools.
None
►
Analytical cookies track visitor interactions, providing insights on metrics like visitor count, bounce rate, and traffic sources.
None
►
Advertisement cookies deliver personalized ads based on your previous visits and analyze the effectiveness of ad campaigns.
None
►
Unclassified cookies are cookies that we are in the process of classifying, together with the providers of individual cookies.
None
Powered by