- Commuted overtime is recognised as a contractual monthly entitlement reflected on the doctor’s payslip.
- The employer was barred from stopping payment simply because the employee was on suspension.
- Leave to appeal refused and repayment of more than R402 000 with interest confirmed.
The Labour Court has ordered the Western Cape Department of Health to repay more than R402 000 in withheld commuted overtime to specialist doctor Kwazi Celani Zwakele Ndlovu.
Acting Judge C de Kockfound that the fixed overtime formed part of his salary and could not be lawfully withheld during a precautionary suspension.
Commuted overtime is a system where employees are paid a fixed monthly amount for expected extra hours instead of being paid per hour worked, and it functions as a built in component of remuneration.
Fixed overtime formed part of remuneration
The department argued that overtime is only payable for hours actually worked and authorised, and that Ndlovu could not claim the payment while he was not physically working. It relied on authorities dealing with ordinary hourly overtime.
The court rejected that approach and drew a clear distinction between hourly overtime and commuted overtime. It held that once a commuted overtime agreement is concluded and implemented, the payment becomes contractual and is paid every month regardless of fluctuations in actual hours.
Ndlovu’s payslips consistently reflected “fixed overtime” of about R40,000 per month. That regular, automatic payment showed it was embedded in his remuneration package rather than discretionary.
Suspension cannot justify cutting salary
The judge stated that “the very nature of commuted overtime is that the employee receives a fixed payment irrespective of the actual hours worked in any particular month.” Because the department itself prevented Ndlovu from working by suspending him, it could not rely on that absence to justify withholding a fixed portion of his pay.
Allowing that, the court found, would effectively turn a precautionary suspension into a financial penalty. Suspension is meant to be neutral, not punitive.
On that basis, the court refused leave to appeal and confirmed the earlier order directing payment of R402 287.60 in withheld commuted overtime with interest.
Compensation and order
Ndlovu’s conditional cross appeal for higher compensation was dismissed. The court held that one month’s salary was a fair and equitable solatium for the unfair suspension, particularly as he had continued receiving his basic salary and would now recover the full overtime amount. No order as to costs was made.
Get your news on the go. Click here to follow the Conviction WhatsApp channel.
