After 43 years of legal battles, South Africa's justice system finally confronts one of apartheid's most brutal crimes against young activists. The COSAS 4 case establishes a crucial precedent: crimes against humanity have no time limit, offering both justice for grieving families and accountability for a nation still healing from its past.
The crime
Eustice 'Bimbo' Madikela, Ntshingo Matabane, Fanyana Nhlapo and Zandisile Musi, collectively known as the COSAS 4, were young members of the Congress of South African Students, an organisation associated with the then-banned ANC. In 1982, their lives were tragically altered in an explosive trap set by the apartheid regime's security forces, a crime that would take decades to bring to court.
Tlhomedi Ephraim Mfalapitsa, once a member of Umkhonto weSizwe (MK), the military branch of the ANC, had defected to become a Security Branch officer in the South African Police. Using his previous connection to Musi's brothers who had served with him in MK during their time in exile, Mfalapitsa established contact with Musi, who erroneously believed Mfalapitsa was still an MK operative.
When Musi explored the possibility of leaving the country with him, Mfalapitsa reported these discussions to his superiors. They devised a sinister plan: lure Musi and his comrades to a pump house at a mine near Krugersdorp under the false promise of providing military training.
On or about 15 February 1982, the trap was sprung. An explosion tore through the pump house, killing Madikela, Matabane, and Nhlapo. Musi was the sole survivor, though seriously injured. The Security Branch orchestrated the scene to create the impression that the young men had accidentally blown themselves up during training.
The cover-up
The victims' families were told by the police that the COSAS 4 had blown themselves up, a deliberate lie that would stand for nearly two decades.
The truth remained buried until May 1999, when former Security Branch officers Carel Coetzee, Willem Frederick Schoon, Abraham Grobbelaar, Christiaan Siebert Rorich and Mfalapitsa applied for amnesty before the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC). Their applications were denied, and the case was referred to the National Prosecuting Authority for investigation and prosecution. The COSAS 4 case became one of approximately 400 apartheid-era cases suppressed through political interference.
The long battle for justice
Progress toward justice moved at a glacial pace. It wasn't until September 2020 that the Pro-Bono Department of Webber Wentzel filed an application on behalf of Maide Selebi, sister of Eustice Madikela, and Patience Nhlapo, cousin of Fanyana Nhlapo, seeking a court order to exhume the bodies of the deceased.
In August 2021, nearly four decades after the murders, Mfalapitsa and Security Branch explosives expert Christiaan Siebert Rorich were finally charged with kidnapping and murder. By November 2021, the charges were expanded to include crimes against humanity of murder and the crime against humanity of apartheid.
Yet the wheels of justice continued to grind slowly. The trial faced repeated delays, including a prolonged dispute over legal defence fees after the South African Police Service refused to pay for Rorich's legal representation. On 25 March 2022, Judge Ratha Mokgoatlheng heard arguments on whether to order the SAPS to pay Rorich's reasonable legal costs. The judge ruled in favour of payment on 4 May 2022, but the SAPS failed to comply.
Legal obstacles and delays
The case saw further delays throughout 2023 and 2024, with multiple postponement applications from both defendants' legal teams. Mfalapitsa launched a civil review of his 2001 amnesty decision on 14 July 2023, just before the criminal trial was set to begin. Rorich objected to the crimes against humanity charges and launched his own civil application seeking declaratory and interdictory relief.
These delaying tactics prompted extensive judicial management by Judge Dario Dosio and Deputy Judge President Sutherland of the Gauteng High Court. They ordered that Mfalapitsa's review application of the TRC's amnesty decision be heard in October 2024, while Rorich's civil application was withdrawn. The criminal trial was firmly scheduled to commence on 20 November 2024, with the court stipulating that no postponement would be entertained for reasons including "the convenience of counsel or the availability of preferred counsel."
The Legal Resources Centre, representing the COSAS 4 families, joined the proceedings as amicus curiae in September 2024. And on 18 October 2024, Judge Wilson heard Mfalapitsa's application to overturn the TRC's 2001 refusal of amnesty.
The Gauteng High Court in Johannesburg has reaffirmed the rule of law by unequivocally dismissing objections to charges of crimes against humanity.
Landmark ruling
On 11 November 2024, Judge Wilson delivered a decisive judgment dismissing Mfalapitsa's application. The court upheld the TRC Amnesty Committee's finding that the murders were not proportionate to any political objective claimed by Mfalapitsa. In fact, it was Mfalapitsa himself who had created the very justification for the murders by escalating the COSAS 4 into a position of perceived threat.
Finally, on 14 April 2025, a full 43 years after the murders, the Gauteng High Court in Johannesburg reaffirmed the rule of law by unequivocally dismissing objections to charges of crimes against humanity against both defendants.
The Director of Public Prosecutions in the Gauteng Division, Johannesburg, Advocate Andrew Chauke, welcomed the court's decision. The state had argued that Section 232 of the Constitution provides an independent legal basis for the state to fulfil its obligations to prosecute international crimes, including those committed before 1994. The prosecution maintained that crimes against humanity are part of South African law and are not subject to any statute of limitation.
“The crimes which the accused are charged with are imprescriptible. Therefore, there is no period within which charges must be brought. A delay in prosecution is not a defence in law against these crimes, nor does it waiver the state’s right to prosecute. Not only does the State have the authority to bring these charges and proceed with the prosecution; the State in accordance with the values underpinning our Constitution and our international obligations has a duty to bring to justice those who allegedly committed crimes against humanity,” the state submitted.
Regarding the accused’s submissions about their rights to a fair trial, the state responded that these rights are not confined to the position of the accused only, but extends to society as a whole, in particular, the affected families who have been longing to see justice prevail against alleged perpetrators of atrocities under the apartheid regime.
#Conviction
Get your news on the go. Click here to follow the Conviction WhatsApp channel.
2 Comments
Are these TRC cases based on political parties differences or on merit.
Just asking for clarification sake
They are supposed to be based on the merit, and we can only hope that this is the only principle the prosecution is using. We will pose this question to the NPA.