Skip to content
Close Menu
ConvictionConviction
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

Gauteng’s cancellation of R200 million hospital gas contract declared unlawful

September 17, 2026

Employee sought medical advice not to be vaccinated for COVID-19, but still got fired

September 17, 2026

Constitutional Court orders Parliament to restart procurement law after public participation failure

September 17, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trending
  • Gauteng’s cancellation of R200 million hospital gas contract declared unlawful
  • Employee sought medical advice not to be vaccinated for COVID-19, but still got fired
  • Constitutional Court orders Parliament to restart procurement law after public participation failure
  • Smoke breaks do not become authorised because supervisors know about them
  • Divorcing mother secures R48,000 monthly support for three children facing homelessness
  • University loses urgent bid to stop dental technology suspension process
  • The Hottest Hairstyle at Fashion Week Is Not on the Runways
  • Day 3 of Spring 2016 New York Fashion Week’s most inspiring
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
ConvictionConviction
Sonneblom
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch
ConvictionConviction
Home » Dismissal of women employees because of pregnancy is against the law
Special Reports

Dismissal of women employees because of pregnancy is against the law

Kennedy MudzuliBy Kennedy MudzuliNovember 11, 2024Updated:November 11, 2024No Comments
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

EMPLOYERS cannot prescribe how often and when a female emoloyee should get pregnant. However, in the case of Nikita Twitchen from the UK, the opposite happened.

Twitchen has been granted about R630 000 payout after she was fired her for falling pregnant again while on maternity leave.

The 27-year-old woman was preparing to return to her job after having a baby when she discovered that she was pregnant again.

Her manager at First Grade Projects dismissed her from work before she returned. He was unhappy that she had to go on another 36-week maternity leave.

However, Twitchen took the matter to an employment tribunal, where Judge Robin Havard ruled that she was unfairly dismissed.

The tribunal heard that Twitchen fell pregnant and took maternity leave in June 2022. After eight months, she had a meeting with her manager, during which Twitchen revealed she was eight-weeks pregnant.

Days later when she was due to resume work, the manager messaged her saying “it’s best to leave it until you have your routine in place”.

He later claimed that a new software was being installed, meaning her role would no longer exist, the UK’s Daily Mail reported.

However, in court, Judge Havard found that Twitchen was dismissed because she was pregnant.

We spoke to at least three women regarding this matter, and all of them felt Twitchen was unfairly discriminated against by the employer.

“Look, when you employ a woman, you should know she may get pregnant at some point – and she can get pregnant as many times as she wants to. This does not in anyway determine her suitability for the job,” Felicia Ndlovu of Pretoria said.

Another, who preferred not to be named, said she faced a similar predicament at a reputable company in Sandton, where the employer made it clear “you get pregnant at own risk, and that your job cannot be guaranteed when you return”.

According to Ele Masia, Twitchen and other women in her position should be granted a right to choose when to get pregnant. In fact, their pregnancy has nothing to do with the emoloyer, she added.

In South Africa, the Constitution protects the right to bodily and psychological integrity, which includes the right to make decisions concerning reproduction, and gives every person the right to health services, including reproductive health care.

It further states that no person may be discriminated against or dismissed on account of pregnancy.

Employers are required to provide and maintain a work environment that is safe and without risk to the health of employees. This includes risks to the reproductive health of employees.

Featured
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Kennedy Mudzuli

Multiple award-winner with passion for news and training young journalists. Founder and editor of Conviction.co.za

Related Posts

Government faces mounting pressure to deliver meaningful GBVF action after Ekurhuleni killings

September 16, 2026

Seven women now linked to Ekurhuleni deaths investigation as police widen search

September 15, 2026

Kempton Park killings: Five women, two months and a question police cannot yet answer

September 14, 2026
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Prove your humanity: 3   +   5   =  

Subscribe to our newsletter:
Top Posts

Your driving licence at the gate: What estates can actually legally scan

Sponsor: My Estate LifeSeptember 6, 2026

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024

Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

November 27, 2024
Don't Miss
Constitutional Law
4 Mins Read

Gauteng’s cancellation of R200 million hospital gas contract declared unlawful

By Kennedy MudzuliSeptember 17, 20264 Mins Read

Gauteng unlawfully cancelled a long-term gas infrastructure agreement designed to modernise heating systems at 10 public hospitals.

Employee sought medical advice not to be vaccinated for COVID-19, but still got fired

September 17, 2026

Constitutional Court orders Parliament to restart procurement law after public participation failure

September 17, 2026

Smoke breaks do not become authorised because supervisors know about them

September 17, 2026
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • WhatsApp
Demo
About Us
About Us

Helping South Africans to navigate the legal landscape; providing accessible legal information; and giving a voice to those seeking justice.

Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube WhatsApp Twitch RSS
Latest posts

Your driving licence at the gate: What estates can actually legally scan

Sponsor: My Estate LifeSeptember 6, 2026

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024
OUR PICKS

Sea Point building plans declared unlawful, but luxury apartment development will continue

September 9, 2026

ConCourt rules KZN government has the final say on removing traditional leaders

September 11, 2026

Mugg & Bean franchise fired waitress, then used alleged racist remark to justify it

September 11, 2026
© 2026 Conviction.
  • Home
  • Buy Now
  • Law & Justice

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Powered by
Necessary cookies enable essential site features like secure log-ins and consent preference adjustments. They do not store personal data.
None
Functional cookies support features like content sharing on social media, collecting feedback, and enabling third-party tools.
None
Analytical cookies track visitor interactions, providing insights on metrics like visitor count, bounce rate, and traffic sources.
None
Advertisement cookies deliver personalized ads based on your previous visits and analyze the effectiveness of ad campaigns.
None
Unclassified cookies are cookies that we are in the process of classifying, together with the providers of individual cookies.
None
Powered by