Close Menu
ConvictionConviction
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

Sexual cartoon golf shirts not offensive, watchdog throws out complaint

February 8, 2026

Lower-paid workers must take unpaid salary cases to the CCMA first, not Labour Court

February 7, 2026

Fund ordered to repay member after fees erase unclaimed R1 069 benefit

February 7, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trending
  • Sexual cartoon golf shirts not offensive, watchdog throws out complaint
  • Lower-paid workers must take unpaid salary cases to the CCMA first, not Labour Court
  • Fund ordered to repay member after fees erase unclaimed R1 069 benefit
  • R1.4 million levy claim fails as High Court blocks sequestration of R2.5 million property
  • Employer ordered to pay R354 000 to driver left unpaid for three years after reinstatement
  • Anele Mda must apologise to Mbalula after court dismisses defamation appeal
  • Magistrate wrong to punish Legal Aid Lawyer for speaking isiXhosa during court proceedings
  • Dry taps, fragile municipal systems: exposing failures of resilience
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
ConvictionConviction
Demo
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch
ConvictionConviction
Home » Dismissal of women employees because of pregnancy is against the law
Special Reports

Dismissal of women employees because of pregnancy is against the law

Kennedy MudzuliBy Kennedy MudzuliNovember 11, 2024Updated:November 11, 2024No Comments
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
blank
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

EMPLOYERS cannot prescribe how often and when a female emoloyee should get pregnant. However, in the case of Nikita Twitchen from the UK, the opposite happened.

Twitchen has been granted about R630 000 payout after she was fired her for falling pregnant again while on maternity leave.

The 27-year-old woman was preparing to return to her job after having a baby when she discovered that she was pregnant again.

Her manager at First Grade Projects dismissed her from work before she returned. He was unhappy that she had to go on another 36-week maternity leave.

However, Twitchen took the matter to an employment tribunal, where Judge Robin Havard ruled that she was unfairly dismissed.

The tribunal heard that Twitchen fell pregnant and took maternity leave in June 2022. After eight months, she had a meeting with her manager, during which Twitchen revealed she was eight-weeks pregnant.

Days later when she was due to resume work, the manager messaged her saying “it’s best to leave it until you have your routine in place”.

He later claimed that a new software was being installed, meaning her role would no longer exist, the UK’s Daily Mail reported.

However, in court, Judge Havard found that Twitchen was dismissed because she was pregnant.

We spoke to at least three women regarding this matter, and all of them felt Twitchen was unfairly discriminated against by the employer.

“Look, when you employ a woman, you should know she may get pregnant at some point – and she can get pregnant as many times as she wants to. This does not in anyway determine her suitability for the job,” Felicia Ndlovu of Pretoria said.

Another, who preferred not to be named, said she faced a similar predicament at a reputable company in Sandton, where the employer made it clear “you get pregnant at own risk, and that your job cannot be guaranteed when you return”.

According to Ele Masia, Twitchen and other women in her position should be granted a right to choose when to get pregnant. In fact, their pregnancy has nothing to do with the emoloyer, she added.

In South Africa, the Constitution protects the right to bodily and psychological integrity, which includes the right to make decisions concerning reproduction, and gives every person the right to health services, including reproductive health care.

It further states that no person may be discriminated against or dismissed on account of pregnancy.

Employers are required to provide and maintain a work environment that is safe and without risk to the health of employees. This includes risks to the reproductive health of employees.

Featured
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Kennedy Mudzuli

    Multiple award-winner with passion for news and training young journalists. Founder and editor of Conviction.co.za

    Related Posts

    R1.4 million levy claim fails as High Court blocks sequestration of R2.5 million property

    February 6, 2026

    First court appearance marks a defining milestone for candidate legal practitioner

    January 29, 2026

    Forfeiture applications are ‘pending’ once issued, not served, SCA confirms

    January 22, 2026
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Prove your humanity: 10   +   10   =  

    Subscribe to our newsletter:
    Top Posts

    Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

    January 17, 2025

    Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

    December 31, 2024

    Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

    November 27, 2024

    Irregular levy increases, mismanagement, and legal threats in a sectional title scheme

    June 2, 2025
    Don't Miss
    Regulatory Law
    3 Mins Read

    Sexual cartoon golf shirts not offensive, watchdog throws out complaint

    By Kennedy MudzuliFebruary 8, 20263 Mins Read

    South Africa’s advertising watchdog has dismissed a consumer complaint against Swing Daddy’s cheeky golf apparel posts, ruling that the cartoon sexual innuendo is humorous, not explicit, and unlikely to cause serious offence or harm children.

    Lower-paid workers must take unpaid salary cases to the CCMA first, not Labour Court

    February 7, 2026

    Fund ordered to repay member after fees erase unclaimed R1 069 benefit

    February 7, 2026

    R1.4 million levy claim fails as High Court blocks sequestration of R2.5 million property

    February 6, 2026
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • WhatsApp
    Demo
    About Us
    About Us

    Helping South Africans to navigate the legal landscape; providing accessible legal information; and giving a voice to those seeking justice.

    Facebook X (Twitter) WhatsApp
    Our Picks

    Sexual cartoon golf shirts not offensive, watchdog throws out complaint

    February 8, 2026

    Lower-paid workers must take unpaid salary cases to the CCMA first, not Labour Court

    February 7, 2026

    Fund ordered to repay member after fees erase unclaimed R1 069 benefit

    February 7, 2026
    Most Popular

    Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

    January 17, 2025

    Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

    December 31, 2024

    Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

    November 27, 2024
    © 2026 Conviction.
    • Home
    • Law & Justice
    • Special Reports
    • Opinion
    • Ask The Expert
    • Get In Touch

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.