Skip to content
Close Menu
ConvictionConviction
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

Everyone wanted this Bentley, but only one owner had the right to sell it

June 19, 2026

Excluded Xihahele households awarded R21.4 million in land restitution settlement

June 19, 2026

South Africa’s migration tensions reveal deeper economic and governance failures

June 18, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trending
  • Everyone wanted this Bentley, but only one owner had the right to sell it
  • Excluded Xihahele households awarded R21.4 million in land restitution settlement
  • South Africa’s migration tensions reveal deeper economic and governance failures
  • Huawei Care misled consumers by promising theft cover but excluding thefts that did not involve force
  • Home Affairs says there is no deadline for foreign nationals to leave South Africa
  • New acting judges’ rules introduce a 12-year legal experience requirement from 1 July 2026
  • Law firm wins battle for records on how CCMA allocated legal work
  • Attorney who blames secretary is like surgeon blaming nurse, judge says
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
ConvictionConviction
Sonneblom
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch
ConvictionConviction
Home » Dismissal of women employees because of pregnancy is against the law
Special Reports

Dismissal of women employees because of pregnancy is against the law

Kennedy MudzuliBy Kennedy MudzuliNovember 11, 2024Updated:November 11, 2024No Comments
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

EMPLOYERS cannot prescribe how often and when a female emoloyee should get pregnant. However, in the case of Nikita Twitchen from the UK, the opposite happened.

Twitchen has been granted about R630 000 payout after she was fired her for falling pregnant again while on maternity leave.

The 27-year-old woman was preparing to return to her job after having a baby when she discovered that she was pregnant again.

Her manager at First Grade Projects dismissed her from work before she returned. He was unhappy that she had to go on another 36-week maternity leave.

However, Twitchen took the matter to an employment tribunal, where Judge Robin Havard ruled that she was unfairly dismissed.

The tribunal heard that Twitchen fell pregnant and took maternity leave in June 2022. After eight months, she had a meeting with her manager, during which Twitchen revealed she was eight-weeks pregnant.

Days later when she was due to resume work, the manager messaged her saying “it’s best to leave it until you have your routine in place”.

He later claimed that a new software was being installed, meaning her role would no longer exist, the UK’s Daily Mail reported.

However, in court, Judge Havard found that Twitchen was dismissed because she was pregnant.

We spoke to at least three women regarding this matter, and all of them felt Twitchen was unfairly discriminated against by the employer.

“Look, when you employ a woman, you should know she may get pregnant at some point – and she can get pregnant as many times as she wants to. This does not in anyway determine her suitability for the job,” Felicia Ndlovu of Pretoria said.

Another, who preferred not to be named, said she faced a similar predicament at a reputable company in Sandton, where the employer made it clear “you get pregnant at own risk, and that your job cannot be guaranteed when you return”.

According to Ele Masia, Twitchen and other women in her position should be granted a right to choose when to get pregnant. In fact, their pregnancy has nothing to do with the emoloyer, she added.

In South Africa, the Constitution protects the right to bodily and psychological integrity, which includes the right to make decisions concerning reproduction, and gives every person the right to health services, including reproductive health care.

It further states that no person may be discriminated against or dismissed on account of pregnancy.

Employers are required to provide and maintain a work environment that is safe and without risk to the health of employees. This includes risks to the reproductive health of employees.

Featured
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Kennedy Mudzuli

Multiple award-winner with passion for news and training young journalists. Founder and editor of Conviction.co.za

Related Posts

From newsroom deadlines to the Bar, Rorisang Kgosana pursues a higher calling

June 13, 2026

Batohi cannot meddle with enquiry procedures after abandoning testimony, panel rules

June 12, 2026

Legal practitioners and law firms invited to reach 100 000 monthly readers

June 6, 2026
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Prove your humanity: 2   +   5   =  

Subscribe to our newsletter:
Top Posts

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024

Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

November 27, 2024

Irregular levy increases, mismanagement, and legal threats in a sectional title scheme

June 2, 2025
Don't Miss
Civil Law
5 Mins Read

Everyone wanted this Bentley, but only one owner had the right to sell it

By Kennedy MudzuliJune 19, 20265 Mins Read

A Bentley Continental GT that changed hands repeatedly through disputed transactions has ended up back with its original owner after years of litigation.

Excluded Xihahele households awarded R21.4 million in land restitution settlement

June 19, 2026

South Africa’s migration tensions reveal deeper economic and governance failures

June 18, 2026

Huawei Care misled consumers by promising theft cover but excluding thefts that did not involve force

June 18, 2026
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • WhatsApp
Demo
About Us
About Us

Helping South Africans to navigate the legal landscape; providing accessible legal information; and giving a voice to those seeking justice.

Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube WhatsApp Twitch RSS
Latest posts

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024

Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

November 27, 2024
OUR PICKS

Foreign nationals leave SA amid growing tension ahead of planned 30 June deadline

June 17, 2026

Attorney who blames secretary is like surgeon blaming nurse, judge says

June 18, 2026

Standard Bank should have investigated mental health concerns before dismissal, CCMA finds

June 10, 2026
© 2026 Conviction.
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Powered by
►
Necessary cookies enable essential site features like secure log-ins and consent preference adjustments. They do not store personal data.
None
►
Functional cookies support features like content sharing on social media, collecting feedback, and enabling third-party tools.
None
►
Analytical cookies track visitor interactions, providing insights on metrics like visitor count, bounce rate, and traffic sources.
None
►
Advertisement cookies deliver personalized ads based on your previous visits and analyze the effectiveness of ad campaigns.
None
►
Unclassified cookies are cookies that we are in the process of classifying, together with the providers of individual cookies.
None
Powered by