Skip to content
Close Menu
ConvictionConviction
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

Reinstatement award set aside after arbitrator mishandles evidence and misapplies law

October 16, 2026

RAF challenges ruling protecting indigent claimants unable to pay medical costs upfront

October 16, 2026

SAHRC vs Lagardien: The sign came down, but the principle stays up

October 15, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trending
  • Reinstatement award set aside after arbitrator mishandles evidence and misapplies law
  • RAF challenges ruling protecting indigent claimants unable to pay medical costs upfront
  • SAHRC vs Lagardien: The sign came down, but the principle stays up
  • Dealership ordered to refund R323,950 for faulty car advertised in ‘excellent condition’
  • Lease, R228 million tender and assassination plots in Matlala’s mounting legal battles
  • Elections analyst surprised but not shocked by ANC ballot ruling, Terry Tselane defends IEC
  • Fraud conviction set aside due to unregistered candidate attorney’s role in trial
  • Moepya commits IEC to ANC ballot changes and pledges review of nomination rules
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
ConvictionConviction
Sonneblom
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch
ConvictionConviction
Home » Human rights lawyers challenge McKenzie’s ‘discriminatory’ job ad, social media post
Law & Justice

Human rights lawyers challenge McKenzie’s ‘discriminatory’ job ad, social media post

Kennedy MudzuliBy Kennedy MudzuliMarch 31, 2025Updated:March 31, 2025No Comments
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
Sport, Arts and Culture Minister Gayton McKenzie. Picture: GCIS
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

The Lawyers for Human Rights (LHR) has formally expressed its discontent with the recent job advertisement issued by the Minister of Sport, Arts and Culture, Gayton McKenzie. 

The advertisement has sparked controversy due to its language, which has been perceived as systematically excluding African candidates. This exclusion, the LHR argues, defies the constitutional guarantee of equality and contravenes the Employment Equity Act designed to rectify historical injustices in South Africa. 

The contentious advertisement specified "preference will be given to coloured males, Indian males, white males, coloured females and Indian females", leading LHR to call upon the government to reassess its recruitment policies.  

In a strong letter signed by attorney Mametlwe Sebei, the organisation details its grievances, asserting that such language is discriminatory in intent, further entrenching systematic exclusion. 

"Such measures are not only discriminatory in intent, but also serve to institutionalise systematic exclusion," warned Sebei in the letter addressed to various government bodies, including the Presidency, the Department of Public Service and Administration, and the Human Rights Commission. The brief also highlights the need for an investigation into the job advertisement's compliance with affirmative action policies. 

Exacerbating the situation, LHR's letter criticises McKenzie's recent comments on social media, particularly his inflammatory remark suggesting that dissenters should "go boil somewhere else," which the organisation claims incites xenophobia and hate. These remarks, coupled with the exclusionary recruitment strategy, have fostered an environment of tension within South African society, according to the LHR. 

"His engagement on X, a social media platform, goes against the guidelines on how public servants should interact online," Sebei asserted. This alleged breach of conduct, alongside the exclusion of black South Africans from the job consideration, represents a direct affront to the principles of fairness, equity, and inclusivity that are upheld by the nation's Constitution. 

To address these concerns, the LHR has formally requested that the Human Rights Commission investigate the legitimacy of the job advertisement and seek an official response from McKenzie regarding the rationale behind the selection criteria. In a bold demand, LHR has called for McKenzie to resign and retract all discriminatory communications within a span of 14 days, warning that failure to comply may lead to legal action which could include injunctive relief and claims for damages based on constitutional violations. 

#Conviction

Get your news on the go. Click here to follow the Conviction WhatsApp channel.

Gayton McKenzie Human Rights Lawyers for Human Rights racial discrimination
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Kennedy Mudzuli

Multiple award-winner with passion for news and training young journalists. Founder and editor of Conviction.co.za

Related Posts

Reinstatement award set aside after arbitrator mishandles evidence and misapplies law

October 16, 2026

RAF challenges ruling protecting indigent claimants unable to pay medical costs upfront

October 16, 2026

Dealership ordered to refund R323,950 for faulty car advertised in ‘excellent condition’

October 15, 2026
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Prove your humanity: 0   +   9   =  

Subscribe to our newsletter:
Top Posts

Your driving licence at the gate: What estates can actually legally scan

Sponsor: My Estate LifeSeptember 6, 2026

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024

Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

November 27, 2024
Don't Miss
Labour Law
4 Mins Read

Reinstatement award set aside after arbitrator mishandles evidence and misapplies law

By Kennedy MudzuliOctober 16, 20264 Mins Read

The Labour Court has set aside an arbitration award ordering the reinstatement of Ernest Sibaya,…

RAF challenges ruling protecting indigent claimants unable to pay medical costs upfront

October 16, 2026

SAHRC vs Lagardien: The sign came down, but the principle stays up

October 15, 2026

Dealership ordered to refund R323,950 for faulty car advertised in ‘excellent condition’

October 15, 2026
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • WhatsApp
Demo
About Us
About Us

Helping South Africans to navigate the legal landscape; providing accessible legal information; and giving a voice to those seeking justice.

Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube WhatsApp Twitch RSS
Latest posts

Your driving licence at the gate: What estates can actually legally scan

Sponsor: My Estate LifeSeptember 6, 2026

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024
OUR PICKS

APRAV welcomes new RAF boss and rejects Road Accident Benefit Scheme revival plan

October 9, 2026

Business owner ordered to pay R200,000 for banning LGBTQ+ people from his shop

October 11, 2026

Tenant who withheld R1.4 million in rent, citing maintenance failures, ordered to leave property

October 13, 2026
© 2026 Conviction.
  • Home
  • Buy Now
  • Law & Justice

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Powered by
Necessary cookies enable essential site features like secure log-ins and consent preference adjustments. They do not store personal data.
None
Functional cookies support features like content sharing on social media, collecting feedback, and enabling third-party tools.
None
Analytical cookies track visitor interactions, providing insights on metrics like visitor count, bounce rate, and traffic sources.
None
Advertisement cookies deliver personalized ads based on your previous visits and analyze the effectiveness of ad campaigns.
None
Unclassified cookies are cookies that we are in the process of classifying, together with the providers of individual cookies.
None
Powered by