Skip to content
Close Menu
ConvictionConviction
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

R1.37 million in ATM cash goes missing under G4S custodians’ watch, gross negligence found

April 21, 2026

Wild Coast Sun misled guests over water park access, regulator rules

April 21, 2026

Splicing gun dispute turns violent as worker strikes colleague on the factory floor

April 21, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trending
  • R1.37 million in ATM cash goes missing under G4S custodians’ watch, gross negligence found
  • Wild Coast Sun misled guests over water park access, regulator rules
  • Splicing gun dispute turns violent as worker strikes colleague on the factory floor
  • Candidate attorneys must be exposed to real legal work early
  • Harlequins advances professional rugby model after Tshwane compliance notice
  • Court rules divorced wife cannot be evicted from the Thohoyandou home she helped build
  • R13,914 debt triggers sale of R380 000 home, transfer halted amid execution flaws
  • Police failure to inform detainee of bail rights rendered detention unlawful
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
ConvictionConviction
Demo
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch
ConvictionConviction
Home » LekkeSlaap crosses the line between humour and harassment of women
Regulatory Law

LekkeSlaap crosses the line between humour and harassment of women

The Advertising Regulatory Board ruled that LekkeSlaap’s airport advert went too far. Its attempt at humour trivialized harassment and ignored the reality of women’s safety in South Africa.
Kennedy MudzuliBy Kennedy MudzuliOctober 25, 2025Updated:October 25, 2025No Comments
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
blank
A still from the LekkeSlaap airport advert, which the Advertising Regulatory Board ruled crossed the line between humour and harassment.
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

  • The ARB found LekkeSlaap’s airport advert offensive and pulled it from broadcast after complaints from viewers who said it normalised harassment of women.
  • The commercial depicted a man repeatedly following and interrupting a woman who clearly expressed discomfort. The Board stated that this would be considered harassment in real life.
  • While LekkeSlaap claimed the ad was light-hearted and funny, the ARB ruled that humour cannot justify behaviour that makes women feel unsafe or undermines their dignity.

LekkeSlaap, one of South Africa’s largest online booking platforms, is facing strong criticism after its latest advert was found to trivialise harassment.

The ad, styled as a comedy sketch, features Tali, a popular influencer from Tali’s Wedding Diary, filming herself at an airport to promote LekkeSlaap’s travel deals.

“Hey guys, I’m travelling with LekkeSlaap,” she tells her phone while walking through the terminal. A man sitting nearby suddenly leans into her shot and interrupts: “Kruger! Man, I love that plek!” The situation quickly escalates. As Tali continues filming, the man repeatedly appears behind her, correcting her pronunciation, “Amanzimtoti!” and “Hermanus!”, each time becoming more intrusive.

Despite Tali’s growing irritation and clear requests for him to stop, he persists, following and commenting even as she tries to get away. Eventually, when she says she just wants to “LekkeSlaap in peace,” he pops up one final time, cheerfully announcing he’s going to the same hotel.

For many viewers, this supposed humour felt uncomfortably close to real-life experiences of being followed, interrupted, and ignored by men who don’t respect women’s boundaries. One complainant said the advert “makes light of situations that have turned fatal for many South African women.” Another commented it was “promoting and trivialising behaviour that mirrors how GBV and femicide cases begin.”

Brand says it was all comedy

LekkeSlaap’s parent company, Tripco (Pty) Ltd, defended the ad as “light-hearted situational comedy.” The company said both characters, “Hannes,” the overzealous LekkeSlaap superfan, and “Tali,” known for being dramatic, are already familiar to audiences.

The company argued the ad portrays a comical misunderstanding between two quirky travellers rather than harassment. It said the female character “asserts her boundary” and that there is no threat, violence, or sexual undertone. LekkeSlaap also claimed that most online reactions were positive, seeing the ad as “a funny and relatable moment about travel.”

Regulator says humour is not a free pass

The Advertising Regulatory Board disagreed. The Board stated that, while the advert was intended as a joke, it still depicted behaviour that could be seen as harassment.

“The unfortunate reality is that women travelling alone are vulnerable and often harassed,” the Board wrote. “Whatever Hannes’s intentions, his actions taken together would likely constitute a form of harassment for the average ‘reasonable’ woman in that situation.”

The ARB noted that Tali’s face showed “a level of discomfort that could be read as fear.” The man’s decision to follow her and mention he would be staying at the same hotel “would be a fairly ominous thing to hear in real life.”

The ruling added that the defence of “it was just a joke” mirrors the dismissive responses women often receive when they speak up about unwanted behaviour. “Humour or parody are not excuses if the underlying depiction is problematic or harmful,” the Board stated.

Although not all Board members agreed, the majority ruled that the ad violated the advertising code on offensive content. The ARB instructed its members not to show or distribute the commercial again.

Conviction.co.za

Get your news on the go. Clickhereto follow the Conviction WhatsApp channel.

advertising ethics Advertising Regulatory Board Gender-based violence LekkeSlaap ad ruling women’s safety
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Kennedy Mudzuli

    Multiple award-winner with passion for news and training young journalists. Founder and editor of Conviction.co.za

    Related Posts

    Wild Coast Sun misled guests over water park access, regulator rules

    April 21, 2026

    Harlequins advances professional rugby model after Tshwane compliance notice

    April 20, 2026

    Tired of spam calls? South Africans can finally opt out under new regulations

    April 18, 2026
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Prove your humanity: 7   +   10   =  

    Subscribe to our newsletter:
    Top Posts

    Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

    January 17, 2025

    Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

    December 31, 2024

    Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

    November 27, 2024

    Irregular levy increases, mismanagement, and legal threats in a sectional title scheme

    June 2, 2025
    Don't Miss
    Labour Law
    4 Mins Read

    R1.37 million in ATM cash goes missing under G4S custodians’ watch, gross negligence found

    By Kennedy MudzuliApril 21, 20264 Mins Read

    R1.37 million in ATM cash went missing on routes handled by G4S custodians, with the Labour Court finding the losses occurred under their control and were never properly explained.

    Wild Coast Sun misled guests over water park access, regulator rules

    April 21, 2026

    Splicing gun dispute turns violent as worker strikes colleague on the factory floor

    April 21, 2026

    Candidate attorneys must be exposed to real legal work early

    April 20, 2026
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • WhatsApp
    Demo
    About Us
    About Us

    Helping South Africans to navigate the legal landscape; providing accessible legal information; and giving a voice to those seeking justice.

    Facebook X (Twitter) WhatsApp
    Our Picks

    R1.37 million in ATM cash goes missing under G4S custodians’ watch, gross negligence found

    April 21, 2026

    Wild Coast Sun misled guests over water park access, regulator rules

    April 21, 2026

    Splicing gun dispute turns violent as worker strikes colleague on the factory floor

    April 21, 2026
    Most Popular

    Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

    January 17, 2025

    Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

    December 31, 2024

    Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

    November 27, 2024
    © 2026 Conviction.
    • Home
    • Law & Justice
    • Special Reports
    • Opinion
    • Ask The Expert
    • Get In Touch

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.