Skip to content
Close Menu
ConvictionConviction
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

Dealer cannot dictate repairs for defective vehicles; BMW buyer wins full refund

July 24, 2026

Hospital cannot hide behind ‘error of judgment’ defence after teacher suffered brain damage

July 24, 2026

How March and March turned a deadline into a death sentence for migrants in South Africa

July 23, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trending
  • Dealer cannot dictate repairs for defective vehicles; BMW buyer wins full refund
  • Hospital cannot hide behind ‘error of judgment’ defence after teacher suffered brain damage
  • How March and March turned a deadline into a death sentence for migrants in South Africa
  • Municipal effort to charge student housing commercial rates ruled unlawful
  • Husband ordered to pay R106,211 monthly maintenance or face jail time
  • Lawyers face the music for poor court papers in asylum case, ordered to repay client
  • Two common mistakes can sink CSOS disputes before hearings begin
  • Only one of four WhatsApp allegations against Harmony Gold found defamatory
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
ConvictionConviction
Sonneblom
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch
ConvictionConviction
Home » Openweb reprimanded for misleading uncapped 5G internet service claims
Regulatory Law

Openweb reprimanded for misleading uncapped 5G internet service claims

Advertising watchdog says marketing implied guaranteed 5G access despite the service being conditional.
Kennedy MudzuliBy Kennedy MudzuliDecember 14, 2025No Comments
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
When “Uncapped 5G Anytime – works 24/7” turns out to be conditional, consumers pay the price.
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email
  • The Advertising Regulatory Board has upheld a consumer complaint against Openweb over its uncapped 5G internet advertising.
  • The ARB found that the claim “Uncapped 5G Anytime – works 24/7” implied guaranteed 5G delivery without proper qualification.
  • Openweb has been ordered to amend its advertising immediately to reflect that its services are offered on a best effort basis.

For many South Africans, internet connectivity is not an optional extra but a critical tool for earning a living, studying, and staying connected to the world.

When an internet service is sold with the promise “Uncapped 5G Anytime – works 24/7”, that language carries weight. It signals certainty, consistency, and performance. According to the Advertising Regulatory Board (ARB), Openweb’s advertising failed to meet that promise.

In a ruling issued on 4 December 2025, the ARB upheld a consumer complaint against Openweb, finding that its online advertising created a misleading impression about guaranteed access to 5G services. The Directorate held that the way the product was presented crossed the line set by the Code of Advertising Practice, which states that “Advertisements should not contain any statement or visual presentation which, directly or by implication, omission, ambiguity, inaccuracy, exaggerated claim or otherwise, is likely to mislead the consumer.”

The complaint arose after a consumer purchased two Openweb packages, including the company's higher-priced “Full Speed Pro” option. Despite using a 5G capable router, the consumer reported receiving only 4G speeds of around 10 Mbps. The experience, the consumer said, stood in stark contrast to the repeated 5G claims made in the advertising.

Openweb’s explanation and reliance on terms

Openweb rejected the allegation of misleading advertising and argued that its services are provided on a best effort basis. The company told the ARB that this is “an industry standard practice across mobile network operators and resellers”, explaining that performance is influenced by factors such as “tower congestion, distance from the nearest tower, line of sight interference, device compatibility, and network prioritisation by the underlying carrier.”

The advertiser further maintained that its use of “4G/5G” was accurate because it referred to network compatibility, not guaranteed coverage. According to Openweb, “every SIM card supplied to the Advertiser’s clients is 5G capable” and will connect to 5G where infrastructure allows, while automatically falling back to 4G where it does not.

On this basis, Openweb submitted that “no false or misleading claims were made regarding speed or guaranteed 5G coverage” and asked that the complaint be dismissed.

Why the ARB disagreed

The Directorate carefully examined how the product was marketed and found that the problem lay not in the technical explanation offered after the fact, but in what consumers were told upfront. The ARB noted that the advertisement contained three separate references to network generation, including “4G/5G” at the top of the advertisement, “Use your own 4G/5G router”, and the headline claim “Uncapped 5G Anytime – works 24/7”.

While the ARB accepted that “to some degree consumers are aware that 4G or 5G capability will depend on variables such as your router and your location”, it found that the wording used went further than merely describing compatibility. The Directorate held that the phrase “Uncapped 5G Anytime – works 24/7“ implies that 5G is available at all times and “does not clarify that the offering is 4G OR 5G, and instead appears to guarantee 5G delivery.”

The absence of any disclaimer proved decisive. The ARB found “a complete absence of any clarification that the 5G delivery is not guaranteed”, adding that this could have been addressed through “an express disclaimer, or by a disclaimer asterisked to the references to 4G/5G, explaining why both are listed.”

Without such clarification, the Directorate said, “customers would not be able to differentiate between network compatibility and guaranteed performance.” In the ARB’s view, this omission made the advertising misleading.

Premium pricing and consumer expectations

The Directorate also considered how the packages were positioned on Openweb’s website. It noted that the “Full Speed Pro” package was the “top tier and most expensive offer in its category” and was grouped under the heading “Uncapped and Unlimited 4G/5G”. In that context, the ARB found that “the consumer would expect the ‘Full Speed Pro’ package to deliver a ‘full speed’ service.”

This expectation, the ARB said, made it even more important that limitations be disclosed clearly and prominently. The Directorate warned that it is “problematic to advertise a product for sale and not inform the customer upfront that uncapped 4G / 5G data is dependent upon network compatibility.”

Openweb’s reliance on its terms of service did not persuade the regulator. While the ARB accepted that best effort delivery is widely understood in principle, it found that this understanding cannot be assumed in advertising. The ruling states that “this advertisement does not go far enough in drawing attention to the limitations”, despite the explanations contained in the company’s contractual terms.

The Directorate concluded unequivocally that “the Advertisement is misleading, and it is in contravention of Clause 4.2.1 of Section II of the Code.” The complaint was therefore upheld.

The decision carries implications beyond a single advertiser. It reinforces the principle that clarity must come before conversion. Where advertising language suggests certainty, availability, or guaranteed performance, those claims must be capable of being delivered in reality, or clearly qualified at the point of marketing.

As the ARB’s reasoning makes clear, compatibility is not the same as performance, and consumers should not be left to discover that distinction only after paying for a service.

Sanction and immediate compliance

As a sanction, the Advertising Regulatory Board instructed Openweb to amend its advertising to “remove or amend the claim ‘Uncapped 5G Anytime – works 24/7’” and to include an indication that the service is offered on a best effort basis.

Conviction.co.za

Get your news on the go. Click here to follow the Conviction WhatsApp channel.

Advertising Regulatory Board consumer protection Internet services Misleading Advertising Openweb
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Kennedy Mudzuli

Multiple award-winner with passion for news and training young journalists. Founder and editor of Conviction.co.za

Related Posts

Judge dismisses bid to suspend attorneys over R23 million dispute, citing unfair investigation

July 22, 2026

A decade of income protection payments declared an error despite earlier promises

July 22, 2026

LPC rejects Teffo reinstatement rumours as charge sheet suggests acquittal on all six charges

July 21, 2026
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Prove your humanity: 10   +   4   =  

Subscribe to our newsletter:
Top Posts

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024

Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

November 27, 2024

Irregular levy increases, mismanagement, and legal threats in a sectional title scheme

June 2, 2025
Don't Miss
Consumer Protection Law
5 Mins Read

Dealer cannot dictate repairs for defective vehicles; BMW buyer wins full refund

By Kennedy MudzuliJuly 24, 20265 Mins Read

A Cape Town car dealer has been ordered to refund the full purchase price of a defective BMW after the High Court ruled that consumers, not suppliers, have the right to choose whether faulty vehicles should be repaired, replaced or refunded under the Consumer Protection Act.

Hospital cannot hide behind ‘error of judgment’ defence after teacher suffered brain damage

July 24, 2026

How March and March turned a deadline into a death sentence for migrants in South Africa

July 23, 2026

Municipal effort to charge student housing commercial rates ruled unlawful

July 23, 2026
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • WhatsApp
Demo
About Us
About Us

Helping South Africans to navigate the legal landscape; providing accessible legal information; and giving a voice to those seeking justice.

Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube WhatsApp Twitch RSS
Latest posts

Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

January 17, 2025

Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

December 31, 2024

Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

November 27, 2024
OUR PICKS

Judge dismisses bid to suspend attorneys over R23 million dispute, citing unfair investigation

July 22, 2026

Wedding rehearsal or workplace protest? Judge rules in favour of singing mineworkers

July 21, 2026

Mpumalanga records highest initiation death toll, prompting CRL Rights Commission inquiry

July 21, 2026
© 2026 Conviction.
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Powered by
►
Necessary cookies enable essential site features like secure log-ins and consent preference adjustments. They do not store personal data.
None
►
Functional cookies support features like content sharing on social media, collecting feedback, and enabling third-party tools.
None
►
Analytical cookies track visitor interactions, providing insights on metrics like visitor count, bounce rate, and traffic sources.
None
►
Advertisement cookies deliver personalized ads based on your previous visits and analyze the effectiveness of ad campaigns.
None
►
Unclassified cookies are cookies that we are in the process of classifying, together with the providers of individual cookies.
None
Powered by