Close Menu
ConvictionConviction
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

High Court breaks stalemate in Mitchells Plain, terminates joint ownership of family home

September 23, 2025

Constitutional Court to decide on consent standards in sexual violence cases involving disability

September 23, 2025

Walking in their world: How the 9th Annual Silent Walk opened my eyes to Deaf inclusion

September 22, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trending
  • High Court breaks stalemate in Mitchells Plain, terminates joint ownership of family home
  • Constitutional Court to decide on consent standards in sexual violence cases involving disability
  • Walking in their world: How the 9th Annual Silent Walk opened my eyes to Deaf inclusion
  • Homeowner’s estate under final sequestration after years of non-payment of levies despite owning unencumbered property
  • UPDATE: Abandoned baby Nandi case exposes child protection failures as Gauteng department deflects blame
  • Abandoned baby denied lifesaving care as government red tape puts her life in jeopardy
  • Shoprite Checkers pet food delivery advert found misleading, regulator upholds Absolute Pets’ complaint
  • Minister Kubayi outlines plan for an operationally independent judiciary
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
ConvictionConviction
Demo
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch
ConvictionConviction
Home » From box to belonging: Inside the journey of babies placed in baby saver devices
Human Rights

From box to belonging: Inside the journey of babies placed in baby saver devices

The future of baby savers is uncertain as a court case continues, but care systems are still working to protect abandoned infants.
Kennedy MudzuliBy Kennedy MudzuliSeptember 14, 2025No Comments
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
blank
Every year, thousands of newborns are abandoned across South Africa. Picture: Baby Savers SA/Facebook
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email
  • Baby savers offer a safe and anonymous alternative to unsafe abandonment in fields, toilets, and rubbish dumps. 
  • Mothers who use them face poverty, violence, rejection, and stigma, with few supportive services available. 
  • After placement, babies follow a 60-day legal care process while a court battle challenges the legality of the devices. 

Each year, an estimated 3 500 babies are abandoned across South Africa, many left in open fields, public toilets, rubbish dumps or parks where survival is unlikely. Baby saver devices were created to stop this crisis by offering mothers an anonymous, safe way to relinquish their newborns without risking their lives. 

The mothers who use or consider using baby savers often do so at the intersection of desperation and isolation. Some are trapped in poverty, others became pregnant through rape or forced prostitution, and some are rejected by their families or abandoned by the baby’s father. Many are survivors of gender-based violence or are battling drug or alcohol addiction.   

The same pressures that drive them toward abandonment also prevent them from seeking help earlier. Access to pregnancy counselling centres is limited, and when these mothers approach clinics, hospitals or social workers, they are often told to “go parent”, a response that closes the door on alternatives. 

How the baby saver process works 

When a baby is placed in a baby saver, an alarm immediately alerts careworkers. They remove the baby within moments and take them for medical checks, including emergency hospital care if needed. At the same time, a social worker is contacted to begin the legal protection process. 

The social worker applies to the children’s court for an order placing the baby in a Child and Youth Care Centre, temporary safe care, or foster care. A 60-day waiting period then follows, during which the baby’s biological family can come forward to reclaim the child.   

If no one does, the baby is declared legally adoptable and placed under the care of a registered child protection organisation, which oversees the adoption process through the courts. This system ensures that every child left in a saver moves swiftly from crisis to care and, ultimately, to a permanent family if reunification is not possible.  

Anonymity, safety and safeguards 

Anonymity is central to why baby savers work. “Without this anonymity, mothers would fear prosecution,” explains Dr Whitney Rosenberg, co-founder of Baby Savers SA. Each child left in a saver is recorded and reported to the Department of Social Development, and a child protection organisation is immediately contacted to take over the case. This documentation process acts as a safeguard against trafficking while protecting the mother’s identity and the baby’s right to safety and care.  

Far from being lawless drop-off points, baby savers are part of a carefully controlled system where every baby’s arrival triggers medical, legal, and social protections designed to preserve life and dignity.  

Court battle casts uncertainty over the system 

Despite these safeguards, baby savers are operating under legal uncertainty. In 2023, the Department of Social Development issued a directive declaring baby saver devices unlawful, arguing that they undermine children’s right to a name, culture, and identity and erode parental responsibility.  

Baby Savers SA and Door of Hope challenged the directive in the North Gauteng High Court in Pretoria, arguing that baby savers save lives that would otherwise be lost. In August 2025, the court extended an interim order protecting their operations until 26 January 2026. This means they may continue to operate without fear of prosecution or having the babies in their care removed while the court considers the main case.  

The case highlights a deep tension that, while the government raises concerns about consent and heritage, child protection groups stress the right to life. “Without this option, many of these babies would simply not survive,” says Rosenberg.  

Holding the line while the law decides 

For now, the interim ruling gives a measure of stability to a fragile system. Every baby placed in a saver will still be met by careworkers, shielded by court orders, and given a chance at a permanent home, even as the legal fate of the devices themselves hangs in the balance. Behind each quiet closing hatch lies a second chance at life, made possible by a network of care workers and social workers working under the shadow of a courtroom.  

A newborn’s life was saved when a mother used a baby saver device. Picture: Baby Savers SA/Facebook

Conviction.co.za 

Get your news on the go. Click here to follow the Conviction WhatsApp channel.    

Abandoned Babies Adoption Baby Savers child protection Foster Care
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Kennedy Mudzuli

    Multiple award-winner with passion for news and training young journalists. Founder and editor of Conviction.co.za

    Related Posts

    UPDATE: Abandoned baby Nandi case exposes child protection failures as Gauteng department deflects blame

    September 22, 2025

    Abandoned baby denied lifesaving care as government red tape puts her life in jeopardy

    September 22, 2025

    Wave of life sentences sends strong message against gender-based violence across South Africa

    September 12, 2025
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Prove your humanity: 5   +   1   =  

    Subscribe to our newsletter:
    Top Posts

    Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

    January 17, 2025

    Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

    December 31, 2024

    Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

    November 27, 2024

    Irregular levy increases, mismanagement, and legal threats in a sectional title scheme

    June 2, 2025
    Don't Miss
    Family Law
    4 Mins Read

    High Court breaks stalemate in Mitchells Plain, terminates joint ownership of family home

    By Kennedy MudzuliSeptember 23, 20254 Mins Read

    Mitchells Plain property dispute

    Constitutional Court to decide on consent standards in sexual violence cases involving disability

    September 23, 2025

    Walking in their world: How the 9th Annual Silent Walk opened my eyes to Deaf inclusion

    September 22, 2025

    Homeowner’s estate under final sequestration after years of non-payment of levies despite owning unencumbered property

    September 22, 2025
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • WhatsApp
    Demo
    About Us
    About Us

    Helping South Africans to navigate the legal landscape; providing accessible legal information; and giving a voice to those seeking justice.

    Facebook X (Twitter) WhatsApp
    Our Picks

    High Court breaks stalemate in Mitchells Plain, terminates joint ownership of family home

    September 23, 2025

    Constitutional Court to decide on consent standards in sexual violence cases involving disability

    September 23, 2025

    Walking in their world: How the 9th Annual Silent Walk opened my eyes to Deaf inclusion

    September 22, 2025
    Most Popular

    Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

    January 17, 2025

    Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

    December 31, 2024

    Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

    November 27, 2024
    © 2025 Conviction.
    • Home
    • Law & Justice
    • Special Reports
    • Opinion
    • Ask The Expert
    • Get In Touch

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.