Skip to content
Close Menu
ConvictionConviction
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

R1.37 million in ATM cash goes missing under G4S custodians’ watch, gross negligence found

April 21, 2026

Wild Coast Sun misled guests over water park access, regulator rules

April 21, 2026

Splicing gun dispute turns violent as worker strikes colleague on the factory floor

April 21, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trending
  • R1.37 million in ATM cash goes missing under G4S custodians’ watch, gross negligence found
  • Wild Coast Sun misled guests over water park access, regulator rules
  • Splicing gun dispute turns violent as worker strikes colleague on the factory floor
  • Candidate attorneys must be exposed to real legal work early
  • Harlequins advances professional rugby model after Tshwane compliance notice
  • Court rules divorced wife cannot be evicted from the Thohoyandou home she helped build
  • R13,914 debt triggers sale of R380 000 home, transfer halted amid execution flaws
  • Police failure to inform detainee of bail rights rendered detention unlawful
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
ConvictionConviction
Demo
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch
ConvictionConviction
Home » Shoprite Checkers pet food delivery advert found misleading, regulator upholds Absolute Pets’ complaint
Consumer Protection Law

Shoprite Checkers pet food delivery advert found misleading, regulator upholds Absolute Pets’ complaint

Advertising watchdog rules that Checkers Sixty60’s exclusive same-day pet food delivery claim misleads consumers, instructs industry members not to accept the advert in its current form.
Kennedy MudzuliBy Kennedy MudzuliSeptember 21, 2025No Comments
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
blank
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email
  • The Advertising Regulatory Board (ARB) ruled that Shoprite Checkers’ Petshop Science ad was misleading by implying exclusive same-day pet food delivery, despite other companies like Absolute Pets offering similar services.
  • Absolute Pets successfully demonstrated that the ad’s slogan and messaging unfairly suggested no competitors existed, violating advertising codes on misleading claims.
  • As a result, ARB members, including publishers and broadcasters, are instructed not to run the advert in its current form, even though Shoprite Checkers is not obliged to comply as a non-member.

Shoprite Checkers has been called out by South Africa’s Advertising Regulatory Board (ARB) for a misleading Petshop Science ad that promoted same-day pet food delivery via Checkers Sixty60.

The ARB determined that the campaign’s claim, “Specialised pet food delivered on the same day … now who else does that?” suggested exclusive service, even though other retailers, including Absolute Pets, provide the same-day option.

The issue arose after Absolute Pets lodged a complaint about a video ad distributed on Checkers’ social platforms. The original version even included a subtitle translating a dog’s bark as “No one,” strengthening the ad’s implication that competitors didn’t exist. Although Checkers later removed the subtitle, Absolute Pets argued that the overall message remained misleading.

Absolute Pets presented proof of its own “Go Fetch!” same-day pet food delivery and referenced similar offerings from other companies. The company argued that Checkers’ advertising unfairly downplayed competitors and breached the Code of Advertising Practice on grounds of substantiation, misleading claims, and comparative advertising.

Checkers’ defence and the ARB’s verdict

In response, Shoprite Checkers maintained that it is not an ARB member and not bound by its rulings, though it chose to participate in the proceedings. The retailer claimed its slogan was a playful, long-standing tagline, intended to spark engagement, not to suggest a monopoly on same-day pet food delivery.

The ARB, however, disagreed. It found that, in context, the ad implied exclusivity and could mislead consumers. The Board noted that public responses to the ad often referenced other same-day delivery options, underscoring the misleading impression. The regulator ultimately ruled that the ad contravened Clause 4.2.1 of Section II of the Code by creating a false impression of uniqueness.

What happens next?

The ARB has instructed its members not to accept any advertising from Shoprite Checkers that repeats the disputed claim. While Shoprite Checkers is not compelled to comply as a non-member, the ruling prevents ARB-affiliated publishers and broadcasters from running the advert in its current form.

The ARB wrote in its ruling: “The obvious answer, the point that is trying to be made, is that ‘nobody’ else offers this service. This is simply not true.”

Conviction.co.za

Get your news on the go. Clickhere to follow the Conviction WhatsApp channel.

The ARB ruled Shoprite Checkers’ pet food delivery advert misleading under the Conviction standard upholding Absolute Pets’ complaint.
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Kennedy Mudzuli

    Multiple award-winner with passion for news and training young journalists. Founder and editor of Conviction.co.za

    Related Posts

    Electricity is now costing South Africa’s poorest households more than food and transport

    April 5, 2026

    High Court confirms Banxso liquidation, uncovers massive investor losses and systemic illegality

    March 30, 2026

    Three reasons to steer clear of highly risky illegal offshore online gambling

    March 14, 2026
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Prove your humanity: 8   +   3   =  

    Subscribe to our newsletter:
    Top Posts

    Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

    January 17, 2025

    Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

    December 31, 2024

    Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

    November 27, 2024

    Irregular levy increases, mismanagement, and legal threats in a sectional title scheme

    June 2, 2025
    Don't Miss
    Labour Law
    4 Mins Read

    R1.37 million in ATM cash goes missing under G4S custodians’ watch, gross negligence found

    By Kennedy MudzuliApril 21, 20264 Mins Read

    R1.37 million in ATM cash went missing on routes handled by G4S custodians, with the Labour Court finding the losses occurred under their control and were never properly explained.

    Wild Coast Sun misled guests over water park access, regulator rules

    April 21, 2026

    Splicing gun dispute turns violent as worker strikes colleague on the factory floor

    April 21, 2026

    Candidate attorneys must be exposed to real legal work early

    April 20, 2026
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • WhatsApp
    Demo
    About Us
    About Us

    Helping South Africans to navigate the legal landscape; providing accessible legal information; and giving a voice to those seeking justice.

    Facebook X (Twitter) WhatsApp
    Our Picks

    R1.37 million in ATM cash goes missing under G4S custodians’ watch, gross negligence found

    April 21, 2026

    Wild Coast Sun misled guests over water park access, regulator rules

    April 21, 2026

    Splicing gun dispute turns violent as worker strikes colleague on the factory floor

    April 21, 2026
    Most Popular

    Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

    January 17, 2025

    Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

    December 31, 2024

    Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

    November 27, 2024
    © 2026 Conviction.
    • Home
    • Law & Justice
    • Special Reports
    • Opinion
    • Ask The Expert
    • Get In Touch

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.